1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Return-Path: <1240902@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFF0F8A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com
[209.85.213.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099EF179
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igui7 with SMTP id i7so37608663igu.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/PmVtmxTLBns9jt9Q/SMR5mFt1Es4tqYQBovuAWJEk0=;
b=cRUeA+k9IpJWyDRRK2NA6jYsLx6Qo+6E8QmQcPx/Vx+JiqLlj64PW7rHJkfx/QHhJy
sehBvAXj1S4xcztiOoEA/++xfb23eR1PgJ77RlFaShDIY6KikZAQ8eIvesMt++2exTM6
6TFcs8HlmE2X8BvVOMq+Ou18xxz0S6UzfU6SCa4cmdTvJw1+ef0/lknUqBYFfDFu4oR3
1P+qscpP0zk5DY/3LRmjsIrNHkhItk+7Za1b2zqtESGLsZ6W+LgvzwlZG/WnoatDO1Xu
TUskkq11Pmr9I742UmJaN+AM9mZWq9AU4tRrm/qvvgQmoprTh2pmntl72z+3xFWwAvBM
wvUg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.57.52 with SMTP id f20mt11069237igq.54.1440900121594;
Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.43.68 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDpC55dsr4GNAUabgnOeXcNTrgHSAtM7Jqfp0_QUfjXmoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE0pACLMcMzHkA=vEx+fiEmq7FA1bXDc4t_hQ+955=r=62V5=g@mail.gmail.com>
<CF21152C-15FA-421C-B369-A9A7DB59865F@ricmoo.com>
<CADJgMztaJHDrz0+7KLouwZMCz--Za6-2pitmjjYVHG+nJjrG=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<2509151.XgrrNGsCxR@crushinator>
<CABm2gDpC55dsr4GNAUabgnOeXcNTrgHSAtM7Jqfp0_QUfjXmoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:02:01 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFzgq-xvwZ+O0iLLAZoTWKMSaHAt+ZRyBe6dBdnLFEQYj=xVDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
MALFORMED_FREEMAIL,MISSING_HEADERS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC - BIP: URI scheme for Blockchain exploration
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:02:02 -0000
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
/tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chain=
=3D000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943
>
> (a tx in testnet)
>
> /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?c=
hain=3D000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
Some altcoins (LTC and FTC for example) have the same genesis block hash.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Matt Whitlock via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> That's still not right, since "mainnet" and "testnet" are not host names=
.
>>
>> You'd have to do something like:
>>
>> blockchain:?network=3Dtestnet&txid=3D3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b31=
0b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a
>
> I would really prefer chain=3D<chainID> over network=3D<chainPetnameStr>
> By chainID I mean the hash of the genesis block, see
> https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/commit/3191d5e8e75687a27cf466b7a4c70bdc=
04809d39
> I'm completely fine with doing that using an optional parameter (for
> backwards compatibility).
>
> I agree with Andreas Schildbach that respecting the most commonly used
> schemes is desirable.
> So my preference would be:
>
> /tx/3b95a766d7a99b87188d6875c8484cb2b310b78459b7816d4dfc3f0f7e04281a?chai=
n=3D000000000933ea01ad0ee984209779baaec3ced90fa3f408719526f8d77f4943
>
> (a tx in testnet)
>
> /block/00000000000000000b0d504d142ac8bdd1a2721d19f423a8146d0d6de882167b?c=
hain=3D000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f
>
> (a block in bitcoin's mainnet)
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
