summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d4/84303bf9c8097e879c005d9b98ff1b0f0d3fce
blob: c57220f1460cc25350b8eaff0679ae0e050ab712 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1YyIvC-0002k4-06
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 11:57:54 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.182; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wi0-f182.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YyIv6-0007Tj-NI
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 11:57:53 +0000
Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so13944167wic.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 04:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.161 with SMTP id a1mr14721894wjb.39.1432900662744;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 04:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.143.9 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 04:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-z3OVmw+0doCe0hmYE6A1D61h0AUh4Mtnf5Fg1e4zQBkpraQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <16096345.A1MpJQQkRW@crushinator>
	<CABsx9T3-zxCAagAS0megd06xvG5n-3tUL9NUK9TT3vt7XNL9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3VCaFsW4+gPm2kCJ9z7oVUZYVaeNf=_cJWEWwh4ZxiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T21zjHyO-nh1aSBM3z4Bg015O0rOfYq7=Sy4mf=QxUVQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2BaKwhpPgcUHWAHswOmUeFLgEk4ysrn4+73qNzWDJ=yQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T3nCJ-w_v-yEbEE2Ytb+xC65mhYqhoAhoOHw9tkPpG0TA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1qH+zucYsGrMgnfi99e61Edxaj+xm=u_xYXga1g0WzJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OVmw+0doCe0hmYE6A1D61h0AUh4Mtnf5Fg1e4zQBkpraQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:57:42 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xj2AFQXsBSon1WikbDQrDoG6RC4
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0psA7hcJdKdA-r01UEt7ig3O-9vjwBMqKSEq-csu0hPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d34fa005c9a0517372f00
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YyIv6-0007Tj-NI
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
	function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 11:57:54 -0000

--047d7b5d34fa005c9a0517372f00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> If the plan is a fix once and for all, then that should be changed too.
> It could be set so that it is at least some multiple of the max block size
> allowed.
>

Well, but RAM is not infinite :-) Effectively what these caps are doing is
setting the minimum hardware requirements for running a Bitcoin node.

That's OK by me - I don't think we are actually going to exhaust the
hardware abilities of any reasonable computer any time soon, but still,
having the software recognise the finite nature of a computing machine
doesn't seem unwise.


> That system can send a block of any size.  It would require a change to
> the processing of any merkleblocks received.
>

Not "any" size because, again, the remote node must buffer things up and
have the transaction data actually in memory in order to digest it. But a
much larger size, yes.

However, that's a bigger change.

--047d7b5d34fa005c9a0517372f00
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div=
 class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>If the plan is a fix once and for all, then tha=
t should be changed too.=C2=A0 It could be set so that it is at least some =
multiple of the max block size allowed.<br></div></div></div></div></blockq=
uote><div><br></div><div>Well, but RAM is not infinite :-) Effectively what=
 these caps are doing is setting the minimum hardware requirements for runn=
ing a Bitcoin node.</div><div><br></div><div>That&#39;s OK by me - I don&#3=
9;t think we are actually going to exhaust the hardware abilities of any re=
asonable computer any time soon, but still, having the software recognise t=
he finite nature of a computing machine doesn&#39;t seem unwise.</div><div>=
=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"g=
mail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div>That system can send a block of=
 any size.=C2=A0 It would require a change to the processing of any merkleb=
locks received.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Not=
 &quot;any&quot; size because, again, the remote node must buffer things up=
 and have the transaction data actually in memory in order to digest it. Bu=
t a much larger size, yes.</div><div><br></div><div>However, that&#39;s a b=
igger change.=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

--047d7b5d34fa005c9a0517372f00--