summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/d2/2b85e8ad5915e5bb6d11218871f5ddf2fd7215
blob: fca3a0e577a08d97ea62fb2a932af0acb0d18f7e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Return-Path: <kiwigb@yahoo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D5D49D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
	(nm34-vm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.74])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF54F149
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:11:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048;
	t=1437606711; bh=Wuy/EQfvBMX9suQo7h1Mja6s6lWPgkh4Dg638B2tfso=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject;
	b=R5NR8fsh9uxcPVwO2+LuyG/OAJdpbyCmk9Z3S/KxrRb98f9wkelujXowmojTnGAh29SGBJEE3TZ9MZ8AF5FmHE3ZRvj87RWOstZtuE5OJVfrQyrFoEOdIjmEXkmMMi+m8vMk/5Ph3FYKGm4qnfipU3FSGmo24Yjm9Is1qcg3Ml49lEb+trV/d2rCoiAe1NeIJb8uvRra4UKnNwdemEURDs6zbFde5o7tOGKJ9UCRG2RJod2nydQogvKb/6O8MbTKOr/zUSJQcIaEtyGmAyp04QhmkgOgwv8UW6/hCQRrF1Qwz90xSxBASj642P7YLLYU6PI9itYcXjTtKx2Pf5fT4A==
Received: from [98.139.214.32] by nm34.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	22 Jul 2015 23:11:51 -0000
Received: from [98.139.211.201] by tm15.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	22 Jul 2015 23:11:51 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp210.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	22 Jul 2015 23:11:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 794291.28749.bm@smtp210.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: vmUnLW8VM1ndxH_Ce6AmZIv7ROrP7IN..l99gh7OXIpYxWB
	L81YayMCfXxYFwETVWjdbQKEuxdWyCEzIBJeVXlIvLuvZYtGWfKt5zrC6.9q
	.oKPw7sSXqotjETia5IKZmP00JMXi.zjii74kSDsfp5bPrsSE5BuKGbeFtN.
	LKR8bGmQoz6O85O5ECrE60sB5cS00Smg2Os66Sb042W9dzOGHUO3uFsb65aX
	6hMbVRd1fo8aeJrb40MMBFkq_G1CKxVNKcK8s1lOwX3_x_P.rDSD5cTeRNuK
	RZjgyGd50OHyTODGQyh9OzNDaPOze2fiO4XaAPMhL9FHdKbfA7oG3FKe7qYj
	3D0H6z6H.owiTH45ezSif6ALo3guNoBfP3mDp9Va3V6jW9Y7UcZ7udZOH5u4
	cWPMLjWxvaSv_lFGVGB.0SZGcqgriLSEdVln6HtmHGtOso4VhQBc83EUNOtd
	_c34_BLeYRLePJn8F_r73B8gMLTlV98BpTwqzvujE4q.I_c2JQHwHk2uVar8
	GGQJjTl5zn28nfrxec1ZKeuZZqLzxgA--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: kMAkG6uswBCBwEfDAoIbXivsMA--
Message-ID: <1437606706.2688.0.camel@yahoo.com>
From: gb <kiwigb@yahoo.com>
To: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:11:46 +1200
In-Reply-To: <55AFBBE6.3060702@electrum.org>
References: <55AFBBE6.3060702@electrum.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making Electrum more anonymous
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 23:11:53 -0000

Why RSA?

> 
> Here is an idea, inspired by TOR, on which I would like to have some
> feedback: We create an anonymous routing layer between Electrum servers
> and clients.
> 
> * Each server S publishes a RSA public key, KS
> * Each client receives a list of available servers and their pubkeys
> * For each wallet address, addr_i, a client chooses a server S_i, and a
> RSA keypair (K_addr_i, k_addr_i)
> * The client creates a list of encrypted requests. Each request contains
> addr_i and K_addr_i, and is encrypted with the pubkey KS_i of S_i
> * The client chooses a main server M, and sends the list of encrypted
> requests to M
> * M dispatches the client's requests to the corresponding servers S_i
> (without the client's IP address.)
> * Each server decrypts the requests it receives, performs the request,
> and encrypts the result with K_addr_i
> * M receives encrypted responses, and forwards them to the client.
> * The client decrypts the encrypted response with k_addr_i
>