1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FC3C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBFD83EDC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id WwHl3Yz5eVCr
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEE983E34
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id g25so3650792ljm.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 12 Jun 2022 06:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=6Z4x0LNFHjG4qWlRP0xtjQ6ByD+6qzNGAB1QA5EcJIM=;
b=r8XOKrhQwei01vPxjK/BEMIrehk0IAoFWfmX9P9y1JQAPuskohnJ102vVn5u9YMpUI
UzeuckGRYxGCkmiB3jGwBcX8kE+cJsiNBVwKrgqYfHPOjMq0EUnQao4KbwvInZVUT8hO
OsYsJ2sK3tBsh15soJNBaWOyGI+C7P2DC3Rqh+wGgz2+EIqo9XtWCeWvG/7a2u59UMSM
iLDB0j6ItlPhPBftzrNC3MWflxVUthQB0ha2LOBG6f6LtFvxhEsbQi0/Wz3QWNHSipC6
6LkkNha+v+iYpKMlncU3YYprvqBgl+kKL2PlBHxUDDSgIMHC+Aqw52NvMrFXJjQ+Hf4V
H9lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=6Z4x0LNFHjG4qWlRP0xtjQ6ByD+6qzNGAB1QA5EcJIM=;
b=Ro3bZIZqMZMsOmJT5qaJ8maeOdS5c96punkf1eYwvG0bd/CdpYGcF06iRzdgtvBdtD
gZuXlWVQyhHo0Qa3Hj6hxDrkfyXGzyieRDtNGAZX2/kcsgicmjQiMG1uEpRwR/1GLdF1
QT6S5Ice8XjF8pNIURXyVfvicmYO9mS3nQ1Hh/ZaVEgi1n+MVCnXDAKWdB+8GppewYXZ
JsSx1nG2VjFQLlu+tJUOHm9whnv+1tMH7gdFIO4rsWRFhtzFOKakLDVEfIfqTFkKrqva
rdrtzKb3TZAkfDKbPZQw2FDvGIFPWJXWyyt3a3ZK845DvVdafvAKwB6Mn61g0EUWW9/9
4+hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532r9Kdw66PFkoFszW+9AJXYMO8MK8RU1damWV4ms5tdq/6lFwBo
zg9EYMxXVsAhsnedQjhfn/wOjyCf48RaUKKJonCiZRE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyu8KIsfzAAF50MMo150N2c0fTBU1JpKBtYiFzlCOkTzlA9+lODvgY2WKJ2su6+UkB5pXWB2KQAnRbI+4YjwR8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:874a:0:b0:255:7b02:8f26 with SMTP id
q10-20020a2e874a000000b002557b028f26mr26179911ljj.320.1655038971003; Sun, 12
Jun 2022 06:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mailman.9.1654344003.14400.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
<CAHTn92zw_MaSKWiZGhGFqFYXJxv6kQ+7=XCHbRLim1jhtEsVVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJowKgJ8GP4Ykzn5dMHZ7wsE04YmpOLgTpdc9tgfVng0qB0Jjg@mail.gmail.com>
<YqVfTU0M7XN8+Ybu@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <YqVfTU0M7XN8+Ybu@petertodd.org>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 09:02:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJowKgLSq5+FjOJ1N8G2puCsTVUr2gV2Z_=JLBUrf2dwL2wptQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4c9e705e13fc989"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 15:52:00 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
John Carvalho <john@synonym.to>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 13:02:54 -0000
--000000000000f4c9e705e13fc989
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Yes
Although I'm guessing most would agree that would be worse.
I certainly would choose to add fee generating features over inflation
Probably most other people would too
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022, 11:36 PM Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibility
> of
> > the Bitcoin software and the core developers
> >
> > Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's security.
>
> Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue
> indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block
> space
> would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
--000000000000f4c9e705e13fc989
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">Yes<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"auto">Although I'm guessing most would agree that would b=
e worse.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I certainly wou=
ld choose to add fee generating features over inflation</div><div dir=3D"au=
to"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Probably most other people would too</div><=
div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 11, 2022=
, 11:36 PM Peter Todd <<a href=3D"mailto:pete@petertodd.org">pete@petert=
odd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Jun =
06, 2022 at 09:02:18AM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> Maintaining the security of the protocol is squarely the responsibilit=
y of<br>
> the Bitcoin software and the core developers<br>
> <br>
> Continued demand for block space is critical for Bitcoin's securit=
y.<br>
<br>
Only because the block reward goes away. If it was made to continue<br>
indefinitely - most likely with an inflation hard fork - demand for block s=
pace<br>
would not be critical to Bitcoin's security.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_=
blank">https://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://pet=
ertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</=
a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000f4c9e705e13fc989--
|
