summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cf/bfed27533f403fa2a5710ac0fc670bd48c5940
blob: 3ae948514de82bab58fce315a8fe97edac40256e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <harald.schilly@gmail.com>) id 1SoHFv-0004Ri-Dn
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:56:15 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.175; envelope-from=harald.schilly@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-gh0-f175.google.com; 
Received: from mail-gh0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1SoHFu-0001CV-NQ
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:56:15 +0000
Received: by mail-gh0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z2so10495227ghb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.76.137 with SMTP id k9mr8963311igw.25.1341852974445; Mon,
	09 Jul 2012 09:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.134.2 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FFB093C.9090109@justmoon.de>
References: <1341849295.94710.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CAAS2fgRd0gqrxXs4Le6nydYBaG7EO=T7FrtX6QZpg3aJtAxSvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1341850157.18601.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<4FFB093C.9090109@justmoon.de>
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schilly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:55:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGG4CB5DudxF052m+oeQUXppZGOYjknzMhYLDFS+m-HrxrxtGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(harald.schilly[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1SoHFu-0001CV-NQ
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:02:06 +0000
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Random order for clients page
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:56:15 -0000

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Stefan Thomas <moon@justmoon.de> wrote:
> As a user I don't want to
> be recommended a random client but the most sensible choice.
> ... wiki page ...

I think this is indeed a controversal topic. I just want to add the
remark, that it would make sense to have the wiki page *and* this more
"official" page. I would envision this official page as some kind of
"stamp of approval" which includes some sensible criteria, e.g. it
works for many users, the development hasn't stopped some time ago
(bitrot), code review, the author(s) is/are known to the community,
private keys aren't accessible by the webservice, etc.

The ordering should be by alphabet, in a vertical list with a short
unbiased description.

Harald