blob: 4f728f0a40b088a6815e8cc57cfcc8814c4a2224 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <thomasv1@gmx.de>) id 1VcY9t-0002HJ-T2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:10:21 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.de
designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender)
client-ip=212.227.15.18; envelope-from=thomasv1@gmx.de;
helo=mout.gmx.net;
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VcY9s-0001Dg-WD
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:10:21 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.27] ([86.73.30.143]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2cYX-1Vt70F1Y5F-00sQVt for
<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:10:14 +0100
Message-ID: <5274CF85.2020106@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:10:13 +0100
From: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <trinity-ba3941a0-f758-4372-b431-c64e9b44328a-1382635758149@3capp-gmx-bs09>
<CAJna-HjgpRhLdVGh+prx54VezHaH1vXGpPotW1Xkz2tiAiWrbg@mail.gmail.com>
<526BDEC2.2090709@gmx.de>
<CAJna-HgH1g8iiSvxXrJuga808SQJ6DKo4AYw4fxpwTRCsL+EyQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBiuLJJV3pB-EF3O9sgB_Z3tuLhEg9k=A9mcxJvgy3UQSw@mail.gmail.com>
<52721F47.30206@gmx.de>
<CAJna-HgD-Vgd_n8x=cD4dAoARMy0LoZJ29_y=tBoX4XYG03XqA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJna-Hj-jjcVB6jSXyy2Epy=ojKsZCo0Dor+5-=RTG4RtC4LSw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJna-Hj-jjcVB6jSXyy2Epy=ojKsZCo0Dor+5-=RTG4RtC4LSw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zck88ZAb3baVWm0yVvAWGt7kmgJlTAaWSFygoQz607juwiCFcse
OMxXZodCaq9FF+ibKlGEpkw+YmAoJaWNyomV50i7T7ZAC57eq8IDduyAZzHXDC/e+RoeGWD
MdoQeeb7PTeFXx5NOx70V/bg46h3k0Ne9MPjF+Hb1H2U8FvksrlqAJHWI+nroWW2lrKNlAQ
Tq6O3r41sZNsfyS1AeWHA==
X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(thomasv1[at]gmx.de)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (thomasv1[at]gmx.de)
X-Headers-End: 1VcY9s-0001Dg-WD
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal to replace BIP0039
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 10:10:22 -0000
Le 31/10/2013 12:18, slush a écrit :
> Oh, I forgot to one practical aspect; the way how the mnemonic is
> "mined" in Thomas proposal prevents usage in embedded devices, because
> difficulty of generating proper mnemonic is simply too high for
> embedded microcontrollers. Maybe this can be solved somehow by
> modifying the proposal, but right now it is a showstopper for us.
>
>
even if metadata is only 8 bits ? (that's about 256 hashes)
|
