summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ce/6cdee027b99094bfae6e21818fc8da0b6e4539
blob: 4cc2a642f583b515a70ba4fda3edc30bc3037ebc (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
Return-Path: <thomas@thomaszander.se>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F04B13
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:39:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (pmx.vmail.no [193.75.16.11])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF06168
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:39:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pmx.vmail.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with SMTP id 8BADE61F4D
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28])
	by pmx.vmail.no (pmx.isp.as2116.net) with ESMTP id 5936E5F151
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from coldstorage.localnet (unknown [81.191.182.184])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7961A19F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:39:04 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:38:54 +0200
Message-ID: <2509294.8eWsy7oNj2@coldstorage>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <55A6E98C.3090307@thinlink.com>
References: <55A5A837.1090203@thinlink.com> <2272402.KPsXmgHuuj@coldstorage>
	<55A6E98C.3090307@thinlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mempool "Expected Byte Stay" policy
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:39:08 -0000

On Wednesday 15. July 2015 16.15.24 Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On 7/15/2015 12:18 PM, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14. July 2015 17.24.23 Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> >> Rule 2: A transaction and its dependents are evicted on its 2-hour
> >> anniversary, whether space is required or not
> > 
> > Instead of 2 hours, why not a number of blocks?
> 
> So users/wallets can know when they should rebroadcast and consider 
> increasing the fee.
> 
> 
> Using 12 blocks, there is a 5% chance he has to wait 3 hours.*
> 
> Using 120 minutes, there is only a .23% chance that fewer than 4 blocks 
> have occurred.**

Using the good old saying; results in the past are no indication of the 
future.
I see a logic error in your thinking.

Your assumption that time is a better indicator is false. Naturally time 
itself is universal, but blocks are known by wallets too. Its just as good.

This assumption of yours leans heavily on block mining times, and that is
not guaranteed in the future.  Imagine one day half the miners dropping and 
blocks take much longer for a week or so.  Your assumptions just broke the 
mempool.

-- 
Thomas Zander