1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RungR-0005sA-O1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1RungL-0004db-TP for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
[184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 407105607EF;
Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:14:08 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:14:00 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.2-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CABsx9T0-eMkfJiOL_2VN5TUuvs_fYANa3XXoM5OX4AMP1W2iSA@mail.gmail.com>
<201202061054.26448.luke@dashjr.org>
<201202071004.37615.luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <201202071004.37615.luke@dashjr.org>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201202071114.01444.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Headers-End: 1RungL-0004db-TP
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Version 0.6 release candidate 1 plan
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:19 -0000
On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:04:36 AM Luke-Jr wrote:
> On Monday, February 06, 2012 10:54:25 AM Luke-Jr wrote:
> > > 769 : Make transactions with extra data in scriptSig non-standard
> >
> > If this affects relaying, it will significantly harm the ability to
> > replace the current spammy "green address" scheme with a sensible extra
> > signature system. On the miner end, it could significantly harm adoption
> > of such a system.
gmaxwell explained to me why this is no longer needed on IRC.
I withdraw my objection.
|
