1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CC79A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:37:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com (mail-io0-f182.google.com
[209.85.223.182])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A16C712D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:37:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ioii196 with SMTP id i196so59154704ioi.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=I3bWn+cHbG1I0lyLPfEq3ITWXoiIPYvW3PgQEf6y0gQ=;
b=JE5k2W5zoD24yUulWSVVla/fMBxPJJr2BPXgLRu4Jh4mHvWa1iwe8XWQfqNTTNd31V
D2KCz+rMq3WL+THn+KrsD4UNYCJ7C7boh37bITQnXahThg3UFXJzkbt4Z3v/xOd63jDq
wQsOcNu7RchcTLfIdCg3E2eA9X99EqEwSCLsKHZzxMco4waSvn/Kmz8NpdI4+1AbVkfL
7FqekcJtgkwTL7PIeCpKFUCqFJ8e5E2oEHl75hHVy3qC2ZS3NINFyx7v2rdLFiNd65SZ
ZYFneCLYmz2IpZ/2a73QpASWaXeTl7pZZ/DWDSMxyfWjHW6uoWOl42JjiKMmzUR0MSrz
qdgw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.27.136 with SMTP id b130mr5029662iob.28.1444837034799;
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.66.195 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <561E7283.2080507@gmail.com>
References: <561E2B09.3090509@sky-ip.org>
<561E7283.2080507@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:37:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBazTE5r5Xvw8M3DRF+d-Qd6KXbdW8W1E0DPmw5KzfY1j6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Paul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Lightning Network's effect on miner fees
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:37:17 -0000
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> However, the two are also perfect compliments, as LN transactions cannot take place at all without periodic on-chain transactions.
Additionally, lightning network hot wallets are not an ideal place to
store large quantities of BTC and users that don't expect to be
actively using LN should in general prefer confirmed UTXOs for
long-term cold storage. So far the guess that I have seen floating
around is that LN usage will at first be restricted to very tiny
amounts of BTC in tiny hot wallets, since nobody is particularly
interested in running large hot wallets.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
|
