1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47A54932
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:22:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148098.authsmtp.com (outmail148098.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.98])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B01250
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
by punt21.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u7OJMFE3018883;
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:22:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u7OJMBwW044004
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:22:13 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38B9F40118;
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:18:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 13E3A20532; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:22:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:22:11 +0000
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Matthew Roberts <matthew@roberts.pm>
Message-ID: <20160824192211.GB24668@fedora-21-dvm>
References: <20160824014634.GA19905@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAAEDBiEkGtj0HSBVgM1KGfsoLmpwK7QxGCTQE1z7FaCPtG2V6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAEDBiEkGtj0HSBVgM1KGfsoLmpwK7QxGCTQE1z7FaCPtG2V6g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 0fde77a5-6a30-11e6-829e-00151795d556
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAYUGUATAgsB AmAbWVReUl97WGA7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQIXe2Fz QXkeVh1ydwEIfnx2 YwhiCCQOW0MrcFt7
E01UCGwHMGF9YGIW BV1YdwJRcQRDe0tA b1YxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAy1N Qx0EKRo/T0gKFT8x QQxKPTIpEFwdQDko
ZwNhYhQnF0ELOUU/ PRMMUEgEM1VwQiFZ AktJDTRBKl8NRiwk
RTtAWlITGyFcRiE0
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth"
Doublespending Protection
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:22:17 -0000
--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:37:34AM +1000, Matthew Roberts wrote:
> Really nice idea. So its like a smart contract that incentivizes
> publication that a server has been hacked? I also really like how the
> funding has been handled -- with all the coins stored in the same address
> and then each server associated with a unique signature. That way, you
> don't have to split up all the coins among every server and reduce the
> incentive for an attacker yet you can still identify which server was
> hacked.
>=20
> It would be nice if after the attacker broke into the server that they we=
re
> also incentivized to act on the information as soon as possible (revealing
> early on when the server was compromised.) I suppose you could split up t=
he
> coins into different outputs that could optimally be redeemed by the owner
> at different points in the future -- so they're incentivzed to act lest
Remember that it's _always_ possible for the owner to redeem the coins at a=
ny
time, and there's no way to prevent that.
The incentive for the intruder to collect the honeypot in a timely manner is
simple: once they've broken in, the moment the honeypot owner learns about =
the
compromise they have every reason to attempt to recover the funds, so the
intruder needs to act as fast as possible to maximize their chances of being
rewarded.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXvfPgAAoJEGOZARBE6K+yY9AH/RFGbldLUmLTUobuKwsF2LAg
DxtP+8UoTLAWr6q8kJhyLooxrTq6dzh+UNEEH+/nGe2FvqkgP9Wftwc51fjFTuWG
Owt7OZB3BNt90VAOXFAtKNC0LvWdV2ligeFg/KHCeEUw06tRMxgnzqGcAayKCSrI
n8tfGJ1jgX6HLJM7oHOulA4SFh6+FeRROpr6DhslCyRcS/ukwwyYSaoX+BczoMQq
0IZrX952/w7K5XpmalBkLLw2jOWDY40dklx+XE6ygbjm8yl3pd/tK5Y6lrXeYnCy
iMjZezhGbmOeO/8XG/lIulAXoxbaSiIVWJk0i17alA4EfEpkIKm8qkS97HAwfhA=
=FXt0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--QTprm0S8XgL7H0Dt--
|
