summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cb/02e747c8d24e3938f38cab190a51ead0c36db7
blob: 677165b4b316d6d3e18543b3bf8fa29588af3414 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E5E71134
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  1 Sep 2015 02:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com
	[209.85.213.174])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B04187
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  1 Sep 2015 02:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbuu8 with SMTP id uu8so60012291igb.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=XirHdvv49LjS5butrHFXHfCg+iyUvQaQjFqoT/k2E+A=;
	b=zYlSg4dkPu0hBqWY+FuRo0L3yJNdaFbD0e891Dm+cbJILUe94iJVC7xflJmK9Mlczb
	PmgmZHFKgV4WMRsB/Y1dEzi36gMg+2pGBhyykO81BwbJnstFzwAH1HuTQM6asu/gXN1O
	kYJTpUFej5scDsWufcBqx4Z3kreynHY1SoLoOo6g67j6TAPFwhLfpcZHLeUIet9F6h1k
	ywZiNbnOa6Uc0EX537nE4pZSuGw3TfBdqKhqxpnOjQuHHChVf7SMsuvijEijvMv3e8ew
	lYRMuMjHHCWX3BAm5jafww1T8A3LqbsNYLylA4ZSaAZRzMHSP8tEh02VW5qE5rQFf5nT
	Dtjg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.79.196 with SMTP id l4mr350146igx.48.1441074308712; Mon,
	31 Aug 2015 19:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.19.86 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CC252814-9AF6-4A28-926E-EE83C517E440@gmx.com>
References: <602b978abcedd92fbed85f305d9d7bfe@cock.li>
	<55E4B8C9.5030606@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
	<e786da226b8e9cfaad335454b299ffd5@cock.li>
	<CAJfRnm4kwHkBLUUOmfzViUwsdAf3LYSTruvHw9+-RbgxSMHLRg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5A3D7824-F1E3-421B-A32A-0EF21DD215BD@gmx.com>
	<55E4E7AA.6010905@sky-ip.org>
	<CC252814-9AF6-4A28-926E-EE83C517E440@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 02:25:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRdhET8+9JS6n7TzWgkoTCWasNU+HKiE7g91CkL3_wCaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's kill Bitcoin Core and allow the green
 shoots of a garden of new implementations to grow from its fertile ashes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 02:25:09 -0000

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> - Bitcoin-B (Blockstream)

Blockstream currently has no interest in maintaining a separate
implementation of Bitcoin.

At this time I believe doing so would have significantly negative
value; especially in light of the current climate where people are
conflating a tremendously destructive bifurcation of the Bitcoin
ledger with mere (and far more boring) alternative implementations.