1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D90C002A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9475440B9A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 9475440B9A
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=YUkgXltQ
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id J8XXsMr8tCwm
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:48 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 6AD504017B
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.25])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AD504017B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA78F32009BE;
Mon, 8 May 2023 19:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 May 2023 19:58:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date
:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject
:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1683590281; x=1683676681; bh=OaOHpYrfSXhit
XwKAmOToJauWrPmjORJRimySU5EQrQ=; b=YUkgXltQQOl+EigKB6pe+AtguudXy
GPjJFLgbuhodvo0BrsSO5NVqsZIJI/e61o7OjQLiWnGmmRyWtsPjyiyt8JLKruno
uBvRYjBB2UdRyd99a6LXZzDlYCMZEMTuxRKYtW+9DE8d4R7IAlKG5+NOlZn6MeHA
5LMy4iivvmIb8X3fVD7FSCuvIVOLUMXsGzI10BIotJKeaW4F5IHKEtSZoaQqUY5J
BV9ndVakt4+Tj+OOr+F95yCtJXfibSMUl/SxXGD+ttOpkKcAttaq3HqEODqoxocG
ocgauD45FVY3pRKrwQ2VkMU2ecI4Q/8NtaGGh7IHPERFF2Na98vMMkZyQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iYxZZKHMuC-LQtQ95ZNiXpQv2cdg9xlj2SLWMVZeG_XKfWyaKrOWVQ>
<xme:iYxZZLXi6eNBnrGkSqq44Xgyx_RxXRc2JIZJwcUiJ-H-M1AfvxCO36b-tcaeYzLF4
ZrtPbg4EQxZ99SHSm4>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:iYxZZEJ9gBiRUj7DI809bBzX5ulBLuvMJezQnOO1TsL4uFD7gGFl9NZwQw8>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeefledgvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghr
ucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg
hrnhepiedvvdelieekjeeukefgtdelfeegheehleffueehteeghfelveejfeelgeevffef
necuffhomhgrihhnpehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg
epudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdho
rhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iYxZZEEN-tj2cdeN6fesCemqMUNePybpDAQB7nrXUas16TipUYGVyg>
<xmx:iYxZZAXPj9zcRyN1xm_y6ogwfZVNAmpWuhWy_dOU2AODDtWmLXvbzQ>
<xmx:iYxZZHM_vMwos_CZJLMcHLjrDf_9r5dg7DyydR-4SFZaKDvnkQKfjQ>
<xmx:iYxZZHQA9M1KFcgsKjgAlm_1kH8wNNfWJJiEPXtO91Zl-YhfFji44w>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon,
8 May 2023 19:58:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1A05F5F844; Mon, 8 May 2023 23:57:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 23:57:59 +0000
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ZFmMh6A7wtjgd1Xj@petertodd.org>
References: <CAJowKg+1WwH_ub9JA=RhnFqvC14RuK4_f4WmJC2P_FYAa78q-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mZNDvK2R+XoyITLu"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJowKg+1WwH_ub9JA=RhnFqvC14RuK4_f4WmJC2P_FYAa78q-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 00:05:54 -0000
--mZNDvK2R+XoyITLu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:59:40PM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wro=
te:
> possible to change tx "max fee" to output amounts?
>=20
> seems like the only use case that would support such a tx is spam/dos type
> stuff that satoshi warned about
>=20
> its not a fix for everything, but it seems could help a bit with certain
> attacks
With CPFP it often makes sense for a transaction to have a fee larger than =
the
output amounts.
This proposal would also screw over applications like my OpenTimestamps
service.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--mZNDvK2R+XoyITLu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bFAY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mZNDvK2R+XoyITLu--
|
