1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACA56C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149058.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.58])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31438108
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:21:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c232.authsmtp.com (mail-c232.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.232])
by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u7S5LkUm091627;
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:21:46 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u7S5LhD6094509
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 06:21:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D1E6400B1;
Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:18:25 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgRTgymPn+YU61N0rR=PRkQbsUHxXt6RySqJbGTCjwuWMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160824014634.GA19905@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAH+Axy4ahvQOG5=jGn68u0m5dTTmFCJ0isfOEt-Be=63ot55dg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160825142732.GA11295@nex>
<CAAS2fgRTgymPn+YU61N0rR=PRkQbsUHxXt6RySqJbGTCjwuWMg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 04:42:01 +0000
To: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <92F89733-809F-40DC-B315-1323DE550BE2@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 4fa8bb6e-6cdf-11e6-829e-00151795d556
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAoUGUATAgsB AmAbW1JeUlx7XWY7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQILBGBZ chgeWx13dwwIfXhx YwhmCCFTDhZ8IFt7
ERoCCGwHMGF9YGIW BV1YdwJRcQRDe0tA b1YxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAy1N Qx0EKRo/T0gKFT8x QQxKPTIpEFwdQDko
ZwNhYhQnF0ELOUU/ PRMMUEgEM1VaJgpD FUVAGzdUIVUAQSVj
NRldQUMVDDxaR08A
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1037:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capital Efficient Honeypots w/ "Scorched Earth"
Doublespending Protection
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:22:13 -0000
On 25 August 2016 14:26:21 GMT-04:00, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev
><bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> If however
>> he is planning to use it as a foothold to further compromise your
>> company, send spam or similar, he will likely try to avoid these
>> tripwires. [...]
>
>Depends on the value of their activity compared to the value of the
>coins.
>Spamming doesn't pay much.
>
>Covert tripwires would obviously be better, but if shared tripwires
>allow you to have 100x the funds available it could be a good
>trade-off.
Also, having a overt tripwire doesn't preclude having covert tripwires as well.
In any case, this all deserves a Standard™ to make sure intruders know where to look to find the funds. Maybe /var/honeypot...
|
