1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
|
Return-Path: <daggerhashimoto@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9901895
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com (mail-qg0-f52.google.com
[209.85.192.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 211FE106
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgeb6 with SMTP id b6so8987183qge.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=KtsbLcoj4iPSujNruCeRVi3Gogrdc/mUW1YzlPDYfEg=;
b=c2HnbBN67LCOIYrhECV6eoYqgYVfvY18M9wXVINKGmmWdYbMldHui9XyBUqWbs0xwr
1cAiHz8uVqOh4Jgwx4QInB+5Er3MLeqoTB27AsrxYDn8EWoDL8VY3RRydm9OCAsQCF1Y
wWhKF+9b4yw/2YtPtK4MP0SAxBXNc8EBQ4uABWT7iDco2CkZm+VehGCf4iG2tWl/16Ip
u99g1EF3Zgb5UzVntX2ysbMDuAuuIXMO4VV3j1pclzMDfDnnvjdjz9GTDf4PBLUL42O2
ywpGTDHAFXBVDL47NrmJeUXqMJXUNLjQEeayHzat7mebMXhEsqmcYO0KdLKRlDWo1eRo
tJBg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.130.196 with SMTP id 187mr17517457qhc.58.1439931597341;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.55.148.4 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55D38025.4030605@olivere.de>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
<55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de>
<CAEz79PrqhSOJzTNWRDv5UfRJa1-f=1OE_pDs0vtHazHso1_5pw@mail.gmail.com>
<55D24625.40806@olivere.de>
<CAEz79PoMgax-Jk1UYP82XzK13r=-e7mgSvpsDE1h4bOATZbKCg@mail.gmail.com>
<55D38025.4030605@olivere.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:59:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAH2CxRASFOfSxAp4a-6N8CcQipwQA1qn7kk0-98LeV1wCKfREw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anon Moto <daggerhashimoto@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f1265c4a89051d9c3314
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 20:59:58 -0000
--001a1134f1265c4a89051d9c3314
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
And this is how the powers that be compromise bitcoin. They can't stop
TCP/IP, but they sure can take over the development team. It's a good thing
that no one from the CIA has had any conversations with anyone from the
bitcoin development team. Phew...
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
> > I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you
> > are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be
> > active in development again?
>
> Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. I
> think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the
> impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the
> moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly
> whether it was Satoshi or not.
>
> Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute
> priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork
> should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the
> cows come home.
>
> But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which
> site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.
> That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.
>
> - oliver
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--001a1134f1265c4a89051d9c3314
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">And this is how the powers that be compromise bitcoin. The=
y can't stop TCP/IP, but they sure can take over the development team. =
It's a good thing that no one from the CIA has had any conversations wi=
th anyone from the bitcoin development team. Phew...<br><br></div><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11=
:57 AM, Oliver Egginger via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@l=
ists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
:1ex"><span class=3D"">Am 18.08.2015 um 11:15 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:<br=
>
> I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense tha=
t you<br>
> are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted =
to be<br>
> active in development again?<br>
<br>
</span>Who am I? Personally I have zero objection if the creator steps in. =
I<br>
think he would be highly welcome by the most people. At first I had the<br>
impression that the email was a fake, but maybe I was wrong. At the<br>
moment I think: Maybe it's even the best if we do not know exactly<br>
whether it was Satoshi or not.<br>
<br>
Unanimity is mission critical for Bitcoin and must be an absolute<br>
priority. If not the vast majority is in favor for a fork, then the fork<br=
>
should be avoided until a consensus is found. Even if it takes until the<br=
>
cows come home.<br>
<br>
But it is very likely now that it will come to a fork. No matter which<br>
site will win, this will produce a lot of humiliated people at the end.<br>
That's not good and leads to bitterness on both sites.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
- oliver<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a1134f1265c4a89051d9c3314--
|
