1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
|
Return-Path: <wtogami@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FA586
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:15:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f47.google.com (mail-oi0-f47.google.com
[209.85.218.47])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB147118
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:15:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oiew67 with SMTP id w67so77696583oie.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=pPMx8UyWHZwQI3QmLilyS7pGjxrCWAkw7KllzWzYne0=;
b=X0lMzLZOvHhWD3IOMtTn8JLMNn2IklWhsZvjJKh3WbKpFeY7kDptbwfou2EWpA8BNC
1WVfrISl+QHugcS65QBRwp30p7+OEv1SrHLkodjoaG6ESvO+CbnJyK4Ds0K4uWzzk/TT
5CYpQQXF6bH/NY3x4wH4UhdBaApWZV6kDL1o5Xr1ULWH6TfF8OOfQkB13BqQy43fACCp
X264zZ4Es9Upi6I34PCc7EqIAHt+ltEK+F3W2vuAf07uV/2dl8T6yHnzG4N5G9jUE8fk
473+LGnzsOKR4QDfZxc+lhAj+ekV0bUZBfO5npgCgrjnkw6Hu4omVjQF82VuEqPOylIH
vIcg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.71.129 with SMTP id u123mr4876536oia.36.1439889332178;
Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.75.71 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.75.71 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55D24625.40806@olivere.de>
References: <6EC9DDF352DC4838AE9B088AB372428A25E1F42A@DS04>
<55D1C81D.4070402@olivere.de>
<CAEz79PrqhSOJzTNWRDv5UfRJa1-f=1OE_pDs0vtHazHso1_5pw@mail.gmail.com>
<55D24625.40806@olivere.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 02:15:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEz79PoMgax-Jk1UYP82XzK13r=-e7mgSvpsDE1h4bOATZbKCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Egginger <bitcoin@olivere.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e501e291b2b051d925cb5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 09:15:34 -0000
--001a113e501e291b2b051d925cb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the sense that you are
suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if he wanted to be active
in development again?
Warren
On Aug 17, 2015 1:38 PM, "Oliver Egginger" <bitcoin@olivere.de> wrote:
> Am 17.08.2015 um 21:03 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:
> > This bitcoin-dev list restarted with an empty subscriber list on June
> > 21st, 2015. So whoever posted from satoshi@vistomail.com
> > <mailto:satoshi@vistomail.com> subscribed and verified the address
> > recently. Do you propose that we manually approve new subscribers to
> > prevent these kind of "abuses" as you put it?
>
> I would simply block the creators old email addresses. Easy with
> Mailman. I thought that would be a good and easy approach, but maybe I'm
> wrong.
>
> Some believes it is possible that the email could be genuine. Some say
> that only the content is important. I have closely followed. An
> interesting discussion. Thank you all so far.
>
> But let's say the poster would be the real Satoshi. Would we discuss his
> posting if he would not claim to be Satoshi? There are a lot of smart
> people on this list, which publish occasionally quite useful ideas. But
> much of this is hardly the subject of greater discussion. Especially not
> when it comes to the blocksize. On this subject almost everything has
> been already said. But not yet by everyone. Especially not by Satoshi.
>
> Satoshi would have a decisive influence on the community. I'm sure. To
> say it does not matter who's talking is maybe genteelly but a little bit
> remote from everyday life. Or not? Satoshi is the creator. What he says
> is in the newspaper and is perceived by all. If he says it's okay to do
> nothing as long as we stand together, then people have the courage to do
> maybe something dangerous or something wrong. Then people only follow
> their hearts. Otherwise they follow their fear. It is a paradox of the
> human nature that some type of Dictatorship can make you free. I say
> some type, not any type. Enough said.
>
> - oliver
>
>
--001a113e501e291b2b051d925cb5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr">I honestly don't understand your position, but I get the=
sense that you are suggesting Satoshi wouldn't be welcome to return if=
he wanted to be active in development again?</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">Warren</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Aug 17, 2015 1:38 PM, "Oliver Egginger&q=
uot; <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin@olivere.de">bitcoin@olivere.de</a>> w=
rote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"ma=
rgin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Am 17.08.2015 =
um 21:03 schrieb Warren Togami Jr.:<br>
> This bitcoin-dev list restarted with an empty subscriber list on June<=
br>
> 21st, 2015.=C2=A0 So whoever posted from <a href=3D"mailto:satoshi@vis=
tomail.com">satoshi@vistomail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href=3D"mailto:satoshi@vistomail.com">satoshi@vistomail.=
com</a>> subscribed and verified the address<br>
> recently.=C2=A0 Do you propose that we manually approve new subscriber=
s to<br>
> prevent these kind of "abuses" as you put it?<br>
<br>
I would simply block the creators old email addresses. Easy with<br>
Mailman. I thought that would be a good and easy approach, but maybe I'=
m<br>
wrong.<br>
<br>
Some believes it is possible that the email could be genuine. Some say<br>
that only the content is important. I have closely followed. An<br>
interesting discussion. Thank you all so far.<br>
<br>
But let's say the poster would be the real Satoshi. Would we discuss hi=
s<br>
posting if he would not claim to be Satoshi? There are a lot of smart<br>
people on this list, which publish occasionally quite useful ideas. But<br>
much of this is hardly the subject of greater discussion. Especially not<br=
>
when it comes to the blocksize. On this subject almost everything has<br>
been already said. But not yet by everyone. Especially not by Satoshi.<br>
<br>
Satoshi would have a decisive influence on the community. I'm sure. To<=
br>
say it does not matter who's talking is maybe genteelly but a little bi=
t<br>
remote from everyday life. Or not? Satoshi is the creator. What he says<br>
is in the newspaper and is perceived by all. If he says it's okay to do=
<br>
nothing as long as we stand together, then people have the courage to do<br=
>
maybe something dangerous or something wrong. Then people only follow<br>
their hearts. Otherwise they follow their fear. It is a paradox of the<br>
human nature that some type of Dictatorship can make you free. I say<br>
some type, not any type. Enough said.<br>
<br>
- oliver<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>
--001a113e501e291b2b051d925cb5--
|
