1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Return-Path: <slurms@gmx.us>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F65279
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:12:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16880191
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:12:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [128.199.188.48] by 3capp-mailcom-bs07.server.lan (via HTTP);
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:12:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-5b2c14a6-d74e-48a6-992c-c22d156b8343-1437772358792@3capp-mailcom-bs07>
From: "Slurms MacKenzie" <slurms@gmx.us>
To: pete@petertodd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 23:12:38 +0200
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20150724174320.GB25947@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <CAGLBAhepXCaChSBsz49YNnLOOpiy9nsNYqNv0NH+G3W=17=2yA@mail.gmail.com>
<trinity-44986062-638d-4c20-a1f8-56a7c7cec648-1437709050654@3capp-mailcom-bs10>
<2275059.uyAkQvreAU@coldstorage>,
<20150724174320.GB25947@savin.petertodd.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CkOzhn+FWRPx3bZ5iKhMzWcmSZiR2rzlwtLttHzO6zg
ppLWdvC7PUiUUxFl0IN4xCyMXh5RRYfGjDcgcNqUA2XZy0DvEj
7bJqX1AM9GDWNAKCsIwPNqVo77vM5oxLK5unuXkF+ILdusfS18
ExhG1yKqJ5kDP/hC7y8G1/vgql5SreJR9BoMSInXkAbYGfRS+H
amVxb9PAXNdQW8n5y73OJPoqQWvvoVvzU+jTjynDiy2oJjzrqa
sD8T7kaTcdpfZ9hFfe9N64uwzNAAc/eixD1PP0y6eOPDvGfUHq
bYj9VNgoICl/KUD4FxWW+LYWNnE
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xD5xZC+y0jc=:n4zJLc0yoS7Ew6sPOyhuKg
b+AAfA4vAVCeSU4/rTCkjX/ghAMxaTUid4XKiSGYPIj7UMSnHXSEJisYrL8WcVxzTPfsgmG74
CVVS/WYAaQs82V7m5/BGqF3g79u4rYFbj9JvSO4ToLOHTYgnr0P/wBZzkuEUStO4Zvg5wz1Fw
nXtFJUV8WKq3Cf4wQ06UEYNKTIEdLMZ4lNtsShUFV9YJ+vED61mofdseDA7+UMCfIn+aDPDaH
W5PM9+s0MF1LLj8CnPC5oo7zr7Yzg0CIR3CobEhvG3z4jMueFpxCEHMkt53eMnSFWRi12GLp8
srhcocGGKJgDTG3hkSRcUjyL1Awo6J9JF2RcMV3pZlObPD7mdkbNplWNLhf4IDUGVk3lZaxhu
lrEWDO4WmQ4nZlLaon5sS2SAI0wkDudSzSbyWLZGOGqXpBRp7qgcMbqq84YncQ4jHJs4bT4x0
L6Sk/ZlLPA==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015,
or "If We Do Nothing" Analysis
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:12:44 -0000
They do not run anything but BitcoinJ (evidenced by them blindly following =
invalid chains), so no proper consensus checking going on here at all=2E Co=
nnected to my nodes is a bad peer (doesn=E2=80=99t relay inventory but down=
loads everything) from 37=2E187=2E136=2E15, with the user agent /BitcoinJ:0=
=2E12SNAPHOT/Satoshi:0=2E2=2E0/ which is owned by blockchain=2Einfo=2E You =
can also submit an invalid transaction through their /pushtx interface and =
get a mixture of noise and BitcoinJ error messages out of it as well=2E=20
If even the people who have to their claim hundreds of thousands of wallet=
s are relying on their security don=E2=80=99t bother running even a single =
node to sanity check against, who are we really going to expect people to i=
n the future if the load goes 8x, 16x, 32x higher? Like CoinBase and others=
, these are the companies which are claimed will be the ones supporting the=
network with ludicrous sized blocks because they have a financial incentiv=
e to=2E=20
Well, they don't even do it now when it could be achieved with a $5 VPS=2E=
=20
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 8:43 PM
> From: "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=
=2Eorg>
> To: "Thomas Zander" <thomas@thomaszander=2Ese>
> Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Roadmap 2015, or "If We Do Nothing" A=
nalysis
> We can test the fact that blockchain=2Einfo's wallet and block explorer
> has behaved in a way consistent with not running a full node - they have
> shown invalid data that any full node would reject on multiple
> occasions, most recently invalid confirmations during the BIP66 fork=2E
|
