summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/c6/c538fbed10acaa72d74b7dc4a79857c6d21130
blob: ba1f91398f0ad9ccfae69c7f2d6e66fd657479fe (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
Return-Path: <prayank@tutanota.de>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED17C000E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  5 Nov 2021 08:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A5881C56
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  5 Nov 2021 08:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.de
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id vbh_VhplqyOw
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  5 Nov 2021 08:17:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77C281C0A
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri,  5 Nov 2021 08:17:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164])
 by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C983FBF397;
 Fri,  5 Nov 2021 08:17:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1636100242; 
 s=s1; d=tutanota.de;
 h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender;
 bh=RNnVI6sxu+AF6kNaG3m/xpt6hL5lJHKk4k2an7ocMYc=;
 b=LL93yY7kfPYtykzTWmPKmSWaIonM/Dn8w9wDHfUiqQdtr8vZ5FTeCHSLq0mWfGc5
 b2YTQP2AXK+YEvGGpadKxKP0q9QdJwFrzORdsX8Z1iq1+q1sml1deTbGXjvr+SF6KV7
 oyJG9gOJcqEFuKhUAvLO9gZAJkMWwUohE2bm3jTjD2YN6Fatp/t+9ENaFAWFar9JvE8
 m25HFLDdPUkiCyODC+euiS91quCWsIPZwHvMM+Bk3IWeZXy563o4GTvHBhXeimacCcq
 3nyN0YxZx8zztQZijcPx2vbfl7P0Z7h3Yio2WrwtLVzvtAEr+qEougam/zLzFmSsa8q
 AWb1dUIPOg==
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 09:17:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
To: Kate Salazar <mercedes.catherine.salazar@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <MnjA6g0--3-2@tutanota.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAHiDt8A30DZtvsPnDDdtyVpho-NKKQhbP_4g8d0MGATawWvg_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <MmT9umZ--3-2@tutanota.de>
 <20211020192054.GA117785@jauntyelephant.191.37.198.vultr.com>
 <CAHiDt8A30DZtvsPnDDdtyVpho-NKKQhbP_4g8d0MGATawWvg_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="----=_Part_429558_55618006.1636100243035"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 09:04:21 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin.org missing bitcoin core version 22.0
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 08:17:27 -0000

------=_Part_429558_55618006.1636100243035
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Kate,

> He is taking the most sensible way forward, decreasing bus factor.

Agree. Work being shared with other maintainers is an improvement.

> Read: https://laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentralize.html

Interesting blog post. First paragraph talks about strange expectations, no=
t sure what other people expected however I expected present maintainers wi=
ll always have respect for the Founder of Bitcoin, keep important docs in r=
epository, website etc. forever and respond with appropriate things if any =
rich scammers try to remove anything important. Anyway that chapter is over=
 and this PR will always remain in history for others to see and make their=
 own opinions about it: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pul=
l/740

What followed it (whitepaper being shared on different websites) was true d=
ecentralization and we need something similar in other aspects of full node=
 implementations. Few things that can improve decentralization:

1.More people using alternative full node implementations. Right now 98% of=
 nodes use Bitcoin Core.
2.More people like Luke Dashjr and Amir Taaki who do not simp for anyone. B=
eing a contributor or maintainer in Bitcoin full node implementation is dif=
ferent from other open source projects. It was never going to be easy and i=
t will get difficult with time,
3.More people from different countries getting involved in important roles.
4.Few anons.
5.Individuals and organizations who fund different Bitcoin projects should =
consider contributing in alternative. full node implementations as well. Ma=
ybe start with Bitcoin Knots.

I am sure lot of people will find this controversial or disagree with it ho=
wever this is my opinion and things that I think can improve Bitcoin. Will =
quote something from my recent medium post about a dev meetup and Knots:

Accepting the problems, looking for solutions and trying to improve things =
is the best approach we as engineers can follow to do better things in Bitc=
oin. Irrational optimism is as toxic as irrational pessimism.

https://prayankgahlot.medium.com/op-halloween21-and-bitcoin-knots-b8a4da4fa=
0bd

Only ~1337 blocks left for Taproot to activate. So cheers to another soft f=
ork being a success and Bitcoin improving regularly. Thanks to everyone who=
 contributed including reviewers. Hoping most of the people will start usin=
g latest version of Bitcoin Core or other full node implementations soon.
.
--=20
Prayank

A3B1 E430 2298 178F



Oct 21, 2021, 01:48 by mercedes.catherine.salazar@gmail.com:

> Hi Owen,
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:25 PM Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev <> bitcoin-de=
v@lists.linuxfoundation.org> > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote:
>>  > > It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly both represent
>>  > > bitcoin core.
>>  >
>>  > There is only one website which represents Bitcoin Core full node
>>  > implementation. You can download Bitcoin Core from
>>  > >> https://bitcoincore.org
>> =20
>>  I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer signing the
>>  releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of the people who seem
>>  to have replaced him.
>>
>
> He is taking the most sensible way forward, decreasing bus factor.
>
> Read:=C2=A0> https://laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentralize.html
> =C2=A0
>
>>
>> Given the level of security at stake here, my eyebrows are raised at
>>  this combination of items changing (new website + new gpg signers at th=
e
>>  same time).
>>
>
> Don't worry and build your own release;
> but if you do, always verify the tree hash.
> Trust signed annotated tags.
> Cheers!
> =C2=A0
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  bitcoin-dev mailing list
>>  >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>>  >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>


------=_Part_429558_55618006.1636100243035
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8=
">
  </head>
  <body>
<div>Hi Kate,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">&gt; H=
e is taking the most sensible way forward, decreasing bus factor.<br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Agree. Work being shared with=
 other maintainers is an improvement.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto">&gt; Read: https://laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentrali=
ze.html<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Interesting =
blog post. First paragraph talks about strange expectations, not sure what =
other people expected however I expected present maintainers will always ha=
ve respect for the Founder of Bitcoin, keep important docs in repository, w=
ebsite etc. forever and respond with appropriate things if any rich scammer=
s try to remove anything important. Anyway that chapter is over and this PR=
 will always remain in history for others to see and make their own opinion=
s about it: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/740<br></d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">What followed it (whitepap=
er being shared on different websites) was true decentralization and we nee=
d something similar in other aspects of full node implementations. Few thin=
gs that can improve decentralization:<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>=
<div dir=3D"auto">1.More people using alternative full node implementations=
. Right now 98% of nodes use Bitcoin Core.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto">2.Mor=
e people like Luke Dashjr and Amir Taaki who do not simp for anyone. Being =
a contributor or maintainer in Bitcoin full node implementation is differen=
t from other open source projects. It was never going to be easy and it wil=
l get difficult with time,<br></div><div dir=3D"auto">3.More people from di=
fferent countries getting involved in important roles.<br></div><div dir=3D=
"auto">4.Few anons.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto">5.Individuals and organizati=
ons who fund different Bitcoin projects should consider contributing in alt=
ernative. full node implementations as well. Maybe start with Bitcoin Knots=
.<br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I am sure lot of p=
eople will find this controversial or disagree with it however this is my o=
pinion and things that I think can improve Bitcoin. Will quote something fr=
om my recent medium post about a dev meetup and Knots:<br></div><div dir=3D=
"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Accepting the problems, looking for solu=
tions and trying to improve things is the best approach we as engineers can=
 follow to do better things in Bitcoin. Irrational optimism is as toxic as =
irrational pessimism.<br></div><div><div><br></div><div>https://prayankgahl=
ot.medium.com/op-halloween21-and-bitcoin-knots-b8a4da4fa0bd<br></div><div><=
br></div><div>Only ~1337 blocks left for Taproot to activate. So cheers to =
another soft fork being a success and Bitcoin improving regularly. Thanks t=
o everyone who contributed including reviewers. Hoping most of the people w=
ill start using latest version of Bitcoin Core or other full node implement=
ations soon.<br></div><div>.<br></div></div><div>-- <br></div><div>Prayank<=
br></div><div><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">A3B1 E430 2298 178F<br></div><div=
><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Oct 21, 2021, 01:48 by merced=
es.catherine.salazar@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"tutanota_quot=
e" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left=
: 5px;"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Owen,<br></div><div><br></div>=
<div class=3D""><div class=3D"" dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:25 PM=
 Owen Gunden via bitcoin-dev &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxf=
oundation.org" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@li=
sts.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote style=3D"margin=
:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"=
 class=3D""><div>On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 04:47:17PM +0200, Prayank wrote:<b=
r></div><div> &gt; &gt; It seems confusing to have two sites that seemingly=
 both represent<br></div><div> &gt; &gt; bitcoin core.<br></div><div> &gt;<=
br></div><div> &gt; There is only one website which represents Bitcoin Core=
 full node<br></div><div> &gt; implementation. You can download Bitcoin Cor=
e from<br></div><div> &gt; <a target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer"=
 href=3D"https://bitcoincore.org">https://bitcoincore.org</a><br></div><div=
> <br></div><div> I also notice that, as of 22.0, Wladimir is no longer sig=
ning the<br></div><div> releases, and I have no trust in my gpg network of =
the people who seem<br></div><div> to have replaced him.<br></div></blockqu=
ote><div><br></div><div>He is taking the most sensible way forward, decreas=
ing bus factor.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Read:&nbsp;<a href=3D"https://=
laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentralize.html" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer" =
target=3D"_blank">https://laanwj.github.io/2021/01/21/decentralize.html</a>=
<br></div><div>&nbsp;<br></div><blockquote style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8e=
x;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=3D""><div>=
<br></div><div>Given the level of security at stake here, my eyebrows are r=
aised at<br></div><div> this combination of items changing (new website + n=
ew gpg signers at the<br></div><div> same time).<br></div></blockquote><div=
><br></div><div>Don't worry and build your own release;<br></div><div>but i=
f you do, always verify the tree hash.<br></div><div>Trust signed annotated=
 tags.<br></div><div>Cheers!<br></div><div>&nbsp;<br></div><blockquote styl=
e=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);paddin=
g-left:1ex" class=3D""><div><br></div><div>________________________________=
_______________<br></div><div> bitcoin-dev mailing list<br></div><div> <a t=
arget=3D"_blank" href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" rel=
=3D"noopener noreferrer">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br></div=
><div> <a target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noopener noreferrer" href=3D"https://lis=
ts.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev">https://lists.linuxfou=
ndation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br></div></blockquote></div></=
div></blockquote><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div>  </body>
</html>

------=_Part_429558_55618006.1636100243035--