summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/c6/2ef6d9d33059cfb0fda0668981be27867d1033
blob: 0dd1e7ac0e631f46973002f0c1392bcab38146bb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
Return-Path: <ibrightly@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25836305
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:51:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.214.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 652C8159
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbkm3 with SMTP id km3so90776006obb.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=GYw9YUnpzDG6JftLofNQ+iFBnSRUz47mBdU5nCz5Eyk=;
	b=lhH6js3RGdSlzLuzakFtYmLFh9KbV1l4o4+6Zlza/N8p6mnWu/SPWbcOaRiz0nfOSi
	rq+RXL8nefkLUBpHZQ/q8b0R90WR5lVu+499NDW6TLgek7ud/akSjjQYT+BXvs8fdPr1
	NzOP60m7PNg3bkoElfgWeD2PH1hYvyytHoBUJwRX65djDYTtFf18wHSrX16RKqxOgnnh
	RBjjZbmY8NAdV5qY9Nd2jNij88/8/FP4z8n81dr0vM+gNQozt8hcKQ6upvVrbj3wnshb
	bQYgJEmyWJWZAq91O8fQR8QeSqRZqHaP5CFGMn/CSGzHtuwWCr+yCs0u+GsBsQOovhML
	E4/g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.94.215 with SMTP id s206mr9268715oib.15.1435499508788;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.177.164 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDovynxmZmf_voz-19mmb5k0R4Snxcucx-WObt_stkAL9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<20150627095501.C59B541A40@smtp.hushmail.com>
	<20150627100400.GC25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<20150627102912.06E2641A3E@smtp.hushmail.com>
	<CABm2gDpnzjph5SKTf+8GWgwe+njS=k2GNm9uL73RC-EV=Y5wug@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150627121016.2360041A3E@smtp.hushmail.com>
	<CABm2gDovynxmZmf_voz-19mmb5k0R4Snxcucx-WObt_stkAL9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:51:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAre=ySbA-JaAZoU1AsGHTZoYOwkeiRnfkYPjMV6yEa_r+SYKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d37ae4bf4040519944617
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 13:51:51 -0000

--001a113d37ae4bf4040519944617
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:

>
> No, this is very important. The majority has no right to dictate on
> the minority.
>

While an interesting philosophical question, I don't think that this is
accurate. First off, bitcoin doesn't imbue  any 'rights' on individuals -
it provides the choice of participating or not, nothing more.

Secondly, from a technical perspective, how is it that the majority (or
super-majority) are prevented from imposing their will? The best answer is
that they are incentivized to not override a minority group since that
reduces the inherent value in the system. However, presuming that the
majority calculate that the reward for imposing a change is greater than
the value lost in such disruption, I don't see how there would be any
stopping this change. The longest chain with the greatest number of users
valuing the token on that chain "wins".

--001a113d37ae4bf4040519944617
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:jtimon@jtimon.cc" target=3D"_blank">jtimon@jtimon.cc</a>&gt;</sp=
an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
No, this is very important. The majority has no right to dictate on<br>
the minority.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>While an interesting phil=
osophical question, I don&#39;t think that this is accurate. First off, bit=
coin doesn&#39;t imbue =C2=A0any &#39;rights&#39; on individuals - it provi=
des the choice of participating or not, nothing more.</div><div><br></div><=
div>Secondly, from a technical perspective, how is it that the majority (or=
 super-majority) are prevented from imposing their will? The best answer is=
 that they are incentivized to not override a minority group since that red=
uces the inherent value in the system. However, presuming that the majority=
 calculate that the reward for imposing a change is greater than the value =
lost in such disruption, I don&#39;t see how there would be any stopping th=
is change. The longest chain with the greatest number of users valuing the =
token on that chain &quot;wins&quot;.</div></div><br></div></div>

--001a113d37ae4bf4040519944617--