1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <laanwj@gmail.com>) id 1WzfzX-0002BR-Bq
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-ig0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 +0000
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h3so5622442igd.14
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.134.135 with SMTP id pk7mr39990556igb.31.1403675003601;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.60.195 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC1+kJNjcPkaHiR8mzofwXE4+4UX5nmxX5Q3rZv37v-K40p1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJDVBQVu8yH9jLu_rQmk=dsJuMUctT-iK0zzOJRYgE8k9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJOQ2uBo2peYKZJyPSQL6qzk6Yu-cF-tPs3GzVS6cAc53w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJBT9u+LMqTfrTwUQrGbnrqj2u==1kmx17uQyY8899O8sw@mail.gmail.com>
<53A99A55.1020506@gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:43:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+s+GJCpUzasKD8KYbweTu25SyXAJAx31TmfYj2iHG2fN62AFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wladimir <laanwj@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(laanwj[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WzfzV-0002Fo-Fa
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 05:43:31 -0000
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <jtimon@monetize.io> wrot=
e:
>
> I think he means that the wallet shouldn't be running as much as it is
> currently doing.
> But yes, I think you're right about wallets and GUIs not necessarily
> mapping 1:1.
I haven't been talking about the GUI at all in this entire
conversation. When I say wallet, I mean the wallet code. There are
very few reasons for running a wallet 24/7. One could be if you're
running an exchange that has to send and receive transactions all the
time.
But that's an exception - in the usual merchant/end-user case you're
mostly receiving transactions and sometimes manually or batched-
sending them. No need to leave the wallet running, exposed to the
network outside those times.
How the wallet GUI (if any) relates to the wallet code is a completely
different topic, and a much less pressing matter. Anything from 'GUI
uses wallet as a library' (multibit, electrum, bitcoin core) to
elaborate client-server protocols (btcd, coinvault?) are acceptable
depending on the use case.
Wladimir
|
