1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
Return-Path: <d@domob.eu>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA0A4149C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:07:43 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.domob.eu (mail.domob.eu [92.222.9.28])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0489EF0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 17:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (vps149390.ovh.net [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.domob.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED0F73B6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 19:25:18 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=domob.eu; s=default;
t=1444238719; bh=lDgPimCPIKB+dRN2BI0btGWHFqXt1TgcVLeMefeaW9g=;
h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
b=BZW1lHbZ8J/UnMrUPasGMtWrno6eekgyqn7u+b9JR3szmbMQsnv4g5gCsn/RJIMMQ
d56zcJlHf/KNsddGYqZzVdEkIoYc2hC5f3tmrQfBCT/pF2OVc0IZmTFSOEmEPWEsQg
MlVzMMCG4SCYwB0aDaQuV2K5C4d7gGt5F+PXrUOVwKOj7ANY7s/9FpCNNWSDKWyB2K
Mkq/zStdrOfxiFuyKnVoDx8TIQJxxUcMDtIo43pH/iER7Dta9JfC+EIznWks0oLJZ1
rVTo6DSauNw5ML//kNhyeafrkraEovcY3BuZ+3ecFo3ObwImcWE8/L4wABY0ExIcXZ
p/hY2bXQNXNX0aDn1pAwz6kvSz6l7F6oNSYnR19leHvsAdclEdWfbSZ1Llb5Cbxfu4
/4pS/mzzXUvZUVhe3Yw3nBeGe7ZUo85bM8Ek8wEUdNTR4fjBImwomGp66yKoVhqCcP
+b4gBLowY5qYOf9xIrksBqZ2Czlc/lFD59vZKFYSDEyKhOgH/+wZYU9IfxDgCpfhhh
dgtP1NvKtJu3355Qdc+l0JJWnEzJI6ZLuHlxuF+fml39rEm2uiDuA4nwdJ4p432Iqj
aqNPGndNInVQBzpgoTY5uOQjdQmx5mletTOwEUUlSSkYKW9hpNpknDfD2F1cpZKKrl
RotbM7yBstiFNhY3oRnztVoM=
Message-ID: <56155572.5040501@domob.eu>
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 19:25:06 +0200
From: Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
OpenPGP: id=A7330737
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="R0hWu1bs2sokwjFdNlLPMuuFSFjfjxOAv"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] The new obfuscation patch & GetStats
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:33:05 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--R0hWu1bs2sokwjFdNlLPMuuFSFjfjxOAv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
I hope this is not a stupid question, but I thought I'd ask here first
instead of opening a Github ticket (in case I'm wrong).
With the recently merged "obfuscation" patch, content of the
"chainstate" LevelDB is obfuscated by XOR'ing against a random "key".
This is handled by CLevelDBWrapper's Read/Write methods, which probably
cover most of the usecases.
*However*, shouldn't it also be handled when iterating over the
database? In particular, I would expect that the obfuscation key is
applied before line 119 in txdb.cpp (i. e., while iterating over the
coin database in CCoinsViewDB::GetStats).
Is there a reason why this need not be done there, or is this an actual
oversight?
Yours,
Daniel
--=20
http://www.domob.eu/
OpenPGP: 1142 850E 6DFF 65BA 63D6 88A8 B249 2AC4 A733 0737
Namecoin: id/domob -> https://nameid.org/?name=3Ddomob
--
Done: Arc-Bar-Cav-Hea-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Mon-Pri
--R0hWu1bs2sokwjFdNlLPMuuFSFjfjxOAv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=6uHx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--R0hWu1bs2sokwjFdNlLPMuuFSFjfjxOAv--
|
