1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
|
Return-Path: <achow101@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069F5EF9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com
[209.85.213.50])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CAF19D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:08:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vkfi73 with SMTP id i73so10584214vkf.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=IOiAZv4SBsGldHER6NOQt30SVXihhj7ClxXTMw51Ohs=;
b=WCduxWZ0Q9/5Q+S+kyIu3m+D+tty/CZ+uAnwKU+5wXCMLaDieL1VoC6MgPDm2QrDGh
HTb6QjiqIT1JrUEUbHaPtAEMPxuGifZTa+JTCKGwxv0zURxeYlT1kRhl2x1wDE++66xF
0w5FiM2COS0bY7Bdz9/UqvSEnuKcl2TUyxHjrKiJfwkwbASIZtgg83GZrarHwUV0Boc/
hN98RtZzy6y4IjxbV+/rbC0D1cegXoS6djSlsU3B9VGpxHQ8yHV+wNQ12YPSgrtBWPKM
CBtDzOdbWOk6MY25hVigSclIWHzzKUSHvBIcSrX/5eoWSIf/Q+B+Yv3n5wZn0gItaQM7
czMw==
X-Received: by 10.52.190.101 with SMTP id gp5mr5399577vdc.4.1440688082168;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADToNK93kmXjwSAxj3WcPSYgq2uReVNJSpX1a5M7DMzgjgv5vA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbEhMNWKCY6CqsSTRQztTz3Ap8PMkO+csz+jptc9Nbazg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADm_WcbEhMNWKCY6CqsSTRQztTz3Ap8PMkO+csz+jptc9Nbazg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew C <achow101@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:07:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CADToNK972BgCXtZScciF_F+Db_AYWP=obXSqUS7DozY-rAmT7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133e6305eaee8051e4c551f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Questiosn about BIP100
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:08:15 -0000
--001a1133e6305eaee8051e4c551f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I have been reading the pdf and one thing I can't figure out is what you
mean by "most common floor". Is that the smallest block size that has a
vote or the block size with the most votes or something else?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great questions.
>
> - Currently working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully
> for ScalingBitcoin.org. Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.
> - Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is there any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how
>> will it be deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner
>> that the max block size changes are deployed described in the bip?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
--001a1133e6305eaee8051e4c551f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">I have been reading the pdf and one thing I can't figu=
re out is what you mean by "most common floor". Is that the small=
est block size that has a vote or the block size with the most votes or som=
ething else?</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Mon, A=
ug 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jeff Garzik <<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@gmail.com=
">jgarzik@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Great questions.</div><div><br></div><div>- Currently=
working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully for ScalingBi=
tcoin.org.=C2=A0 Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.</div><div>=
- Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.</div><di=
v><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"=
></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, =
Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a =
href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bit=
coin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gma=
il_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-lef=
t:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Hi all,<div><br></div><div>Is there any client or c=
ode that currently implements BIP 100? And how will it be deployed? WIll th=
e initial fork be deployed in the same manner that the max block size chang=
es are deployed described in the bip?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks</div>=
</div>
<br></blockquote></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail=
_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">____________________________________=
___________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>
--001a1133e6305eaee8051e4c551f--
|