summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b8/e9444525d1444bd5fb359f48454818458be0ca
blob: 68b47ee1db419a7ec5584fe4d586e1714d068fc2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
Return-Path: <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A4647F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com (mail-ig0-f178.google.com
	[209.85.213.178])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCBF115
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:25:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igk11 with SMTP id 11so11992522igk.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=8AHMYeJSWYYqueWuVd35uocmFFraI39e5RGQspJ/L2o=;
	b=vMtHMXJUXwZ0U5X/QzFSPFl0pXME3CSipZvnQMYW1OwfMsXBLJtDcgFFPybtuGtEzF
	IXbtOWrThnPqdMrZNKwHc7wycT4G84ArgWmCuZAH4IHExVdEzgnBUvM/7/v2LvF2eUNR
	ASKoGIX0FCcv3qnkznCckJV7tPYhq585MbzISKPxX0RPpNSr06Isw7zyhrmtSTuZKZov
	qtbk4tOmSDCkehkxU0ZWtmLETl6/LpQAR7pYkphI66sAaC3kAHsGCvJYtgwyTONbFYWu
	cdBFjuaY0pnKnuLBJ4kCu/EfMcLTeD7qFHft4dX7TkLmv1/BnqvNT6oYqwymY72Gw2iM
	WAvQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.60.68 with SMTP id f4mr5733212igr.94.1438266302964; Thu,
	30 Jul 2015 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.77.201 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:25:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPg+sBj-wA1DMrwkQRWnzQoB5NR-q=2-5=WDAAUYfSpXRZSTqw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b63e14acff051c1878a9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:25:04 -0000

--089e0160b63e14acff051c1878a9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hello all,

here is a proposal for long-term scalability I've been working on:
https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6

Some things are not included yet, such as a testnet whose size runs ahead
of the main chain, and the inclusion of Gavin's more accurate sigop
checking after the hard fork.

Comments?

-- 
Pieter

--089e0160b63e14acff051c1878a9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hello all,<br><br></div>here is a prop=
osal for long-term scalability I&#39;ve been working on: <a href=3D"https:/=
/gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6">https://gist.github.com/sipa/c6=
5665fc360ca7a176a6</a><br><br></div>Some things are not included yet, such =
as a testnet whose size runs ahead of the main chain, and the inclusion of =
Gavin&#39;s more accurate sigop checking after the hard fork.<br><br></div>=
Comments?<br><br>-- <br></div>Pieter<br><br></div>

--089e0160b63e14acff051c1878a9--