summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b8/972ac1dc019798a09a8c54c4f1fbf70b0eb461
blob: 9ef7299dcd8402c100ac5fb41abca35013552ff2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Return-Path: <john.tromp@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5D1C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  9 Jul 2022 14:58:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEBB415A3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  9 Jul 2022 14:58:11 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 8FEBB415A3
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=Fihlv5X2
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id bi_ly8D4naY2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  9 Jul 2022 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 3A29B41A40
Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A29B41A40
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat,  9 Jul 2022 14:58:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id z25so2164089lfr.2
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 09 Jul 2022 07:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=oaKRh7OK/0En8u2pc5gJbWO7+9gkx0EHJ0y218rNsFI=;
 b=Fihlv5X2hL0WFaF6ng0jR8f+nc59d8KDqahDhRPY0KYzMEqYbIJvtblfLLx4VjZTJX
 3C59VcLq2ZKC/yHZo9gu3bBB/8tG4+wWUI1qRJ3ZFaAC4BPYSQm7mRRd6Sk3njB2Otxb
 zolH52mZb/b/KDgut0ODzqnk5MYNRY4zbMBWHWt66bmEQ/6ZkK92HWboJSFQPmlmVeEs
 8My70saMldyn1ibUckf+Yst2L+yBiId2bPCO7vM7zYfs9ZROSOQxYkUFgSJ+DN2OUdwc
 R0YOKF8L5m/hGRS97PcspqPqcnsm9iAtQA+aCQgujEhyTQNj7O8QX3TBLPJxm43Gsj3C
 zt0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=oaKRh7OK/0En8u2pc5gJbWO7+9gkx0EHJ0y218rNsFI=;
 b=xoh5o3l2DJ9u8/8P+dSRDAHAE2JK7VM78Cf/zW/g4Gpd31RE3Kj0B5XOg9ExYN7MBU
 RX3usaAfwS88AyQoSpfv/ZVleogpcSdnuT2YC4iQRCLj6wXaJDeGedpoqz6eIx+tUY6n
 V/SefukTOXKNMNIVN1WGWn6zwiesQF1QVfgiCURkwcrAL9uNFhCqTphRKJoylCa8hfAJ
 XLbgDFmTL4V5WrhjeCEvOu3BJ0o6eWb9nVxu2AJrDw+Q355YkAqWoBm052OwW4EkJt6S
 mxoLoykqOH/kRMHLVs2XkvYqjpvq+HteeWlK5pIsdYL/JThYQQwufB/nkcfq0mPszcOk
 s+cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9oetawb9EMMEPG/cKMmbkLgMxbpGtbPyq65FFWP/TYwhN/IbCE
 7dDOQqX6khWWz02DYXbCh+guBFK+jD/ChCTOOGXDiceABw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tUfhR2U+bf6mJGu3nYgqnVpbdO6SHq01cuxMh5JRtnlsn2GHTFczM2J4Ts/ed824sT15TVhcthuHD+O+BqkNw=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:304c:b0:489:d0e3:2efb with SMTP id
 b12-20020a056512304c00b00489d0e32efbmr684550lfb.34.1657378688087; Sat, 09 Jul
 2022 07:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: John Tromp <john.tromp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 16:57:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOU__fz8XSfEdOS9U7_H4A4jpCgtQepKxaW4jT5go91rhY-VQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 15:01:34 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2022 14:58:11 -0000

> New blog post:
> https://petertodd.org/2022/surprisingly-tail-emission-is-not-inflationary

A Tail Emission is best described as disinflationary; the yearly
supply inflation steadily decreases toward zero.

> Dogecoin also has a fixed reward

It started out with random rewards up to 1M doge per block, with the
maximum halving every 100K blocks, until the fixed reward of 10K doge
kicked in at height 600K.

> If an existing coin decides to implement tail emission as a means to fund=
 security, choosing an appropriate emission rate is simple: decide on the m=
aximum amount of inflation you are willing to have in the worst case, and s=
et the tail emission accordingly.

Any coin without a premine starts with infinite inflation. Bitcoin in
its first 4 years had yearly inflation rates of inf, 100%, 50%, and
33%. So deciding on a maximum amount of inflation is deciding on a
premine.

While in the long term, a capped supply doesn't meaningfully differ
from un uncapped supply [1], the 21M limit is central to Bitcoin's
identity, and removing this limit results in something that can no
longer be called Bitcoin.

[1] https://john-tromp.medium.com/a-case-for-using-soft-total-supply-1169a1=
88d153