1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BF86955
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B025E17E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8TDq78L098124;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:52:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id v8TDq5co089848
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:52:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3BBB40018;
Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C68E5205E4; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:52:03 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20170929135203.GA16240@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20170927160654.GA12492@savin.petertodd.org>
<oqihpf$5gc$1@blaine.gmane.org>
<20170929014543.GB11956@savin.petertodd.org>
<oql14j$4qq$1@blaine.gmane.org>
<20170929095537.GA15286@savin.petertodd.org>
<oqlf95$8kq$1@blaine.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <oqlf95$8kq$1@blaine.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Server-Quench: 618494a2-a51d-11e7-a0cc-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAsUC1AEAgsB AmEbWlBeVV97WWU7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUg0MdV0E VUEeWhB6cw0If395 ZQhkX3hfVUArd1ss
R08ACGwHMGB9OWBM A11YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAShZ WAwWNhofUV4KBDcg RhcEVSkuGEAeDz4z
KAEiJhYWEQ4YPkk/ PRM9XhoyEidXU1IF dwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Address expiration times should be added to
BIP-173
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:52:10 -0000
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 02:45:32PM +0200, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-de=
v wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 11:55 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>=20
> >>> I'm well aware. As the payment protocol hasn't caught on - and doesn'=
t fully
> >>> overlap all the usecases that addresses do anyway - I think we should=
consider
> >>> bringing this important feature to Bitcoin addresses too.
> >>
> >> Hasn't caught on? It is used for virtually all merchant transactions,
> >> plus person to person transactions between Bitcoin Wallet users.
> >=20
> > "Virtually all"?
> >=20
> > I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol u=
sed in
> > ages.
>=20
> I regularly pay with Bitcoin, and I haven't seen the payment protocol
> not being in use in ages.
>=20
> > Can you name some users of it?
>=20
> 15+ Mio Coinbase users
Lol, interesting mistake I made w/ Coinbase: my mobile wallets are all setu=
p in
ways that don't support the payment protocol w/ Coinbase, probably because =
come
to think of it they were (still are?) rejecting payment protocol requests o=
ver
proxies and Tor. And on my desktop setups payment protocol URLs don't work =
for
various reasons, and I'd forgotten I'd manually disabled them ages ago.
Just checked and Bitfinex, BTCC, and Shapeshift all don't seem to use the
payment protocol.
Other than BitPay and Coinbase, do you have an example of a service support=
ing
the payment protocol?
> ~10 Mio BitPay users
> 8 Mio Bitcoin Wallet users
> Plus Bitcoin Core, Electrum, etc (sorry no numbers)
>=20
> Probably the only usecase for naked addresses is paper wallets, right?
> I'm not sure if paper wallets can expire.
User-to-user payments pretty much always use naked addresses.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZzk//AAoJECSBQD2l8JH7rmgH/j18CiwAAswJNTHgz7mr6E/G
5e+uaRnvAqnfNVUoLfs3vll1lOMkh3FXfuVwYJLffnNYToHdJpl+oZTRVDhF9C0T
P1vUxEe1XHjwETgwFi3M1ltjXP9EWilAi+hzMKeLELOg7ZxW3mNGlMlqkPSdJHag
fCJtMrt2M8v3++BpCY3piDShQf+wqM6vPxZbeFGrzSYK2EQ8JHVExVSxikcBvtq/
6hDhKqhE3YOPpPGgnaswNp2ki6mZuNvBaJ7M4cGOA4MDH7kT8QNaKAnISbJLAlyE
KPefAJ3GuDm9CqYN7B3k9AtIovQZQuK/HaS87crUTyskL7fDwo157Rr8MxABH8Y=
=p8IC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--
|
