1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1USp2A-0005H2-02
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:37:54 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.178; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-we0-f178.google.com;
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1USp29-0004Sp-7T
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:37:53 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z53so2263732wey.37
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.109.197 with SMTP id hu5mr18469132wib.22.1366292266882;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.143.36 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0T7y8jqhMDUsf-HNw1sJnVuXngMa3x5+O5qgRE6eswew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP1yKeQMayFHsEUWtA3=q+v5rPAutjzEFVVHopPGNZ4jGQ@mail.gmail.com>
<453bfc69-b2ab-4992-9807-55270fbda0db@email.android.com>
<CANEZrP0z6W0ZDsytQ7Rcqb5L6rswn1wv8cbR7c383Dmpzu+gyg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPaL=UVJd3mdd0bs6Oo9vFHnv_6RbFowjmp0tD-ZbOzZxJEJ3g@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3ocAJNoQ3xJqRTL8Gz3_T8xsCPPAvSfEOYpPo76wgbig@mail.gmail.com>
<20130418090444.GA30995@savin>
<CANEZrP0AYaWnVhrAbMXP0BGhb=CZMg_-PYVzwKbcCoRKC9V2rw@mail.gmail.com>
<20130418100806.GA13908@savin>
<CANEZrP0T7y8jqhMDUsf-HNw1sJnVuXngMa3x5+O5qgRE6eswew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:37:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T18vvd1B4hSGU2eMnQTT9N-6Eoq29RAw_NiYdoNwe5uog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2356f73a209b04daa2b568
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1USp29-0004Sp-7T
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anti DoS for tx replacement
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:37:54 -0000
--e89a8f2356f73a209b04daa2b568
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> sure it's worth doing, at least immediately. Weakening the non-final ==
>>
> non-standard test to give a window of, say, 3 blocks, would be fine I
>> think.
>>
>
> Sure. I think Gavin wants some kind of wider memory pool limiter policy
> which would encompass such a thing already.
>
Yes.
I don't want to spend any time thinking about memory pool transaction
replacement until after we pay some technical debt:
+ Memory-limited memory pool, with relay policy matching block-creation
policy
+ Child-pays-for-parent fees
+ Auto-computed fees, based on transactions moving from the memory pool
into blocks
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--e89a8f2356f73a209b04daa2b568
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=A0<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=
=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=
=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex=
;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style=
:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><span style=3D"color:rgb(34,34,34)">sure it's worth doing, at leas=
t immediately. Weakening the non-final =3D=3D</span><br></div></blockquote>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-=
left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;p=
adding-left:1ex">
non-standard test to give a window of, say, 3 blocks, would be fine I<br>
think.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Sure. I think Gavin wants =
some kind of wider memory pool limiter policy which would encompass such a =
thing already.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>
Yes.</div><div><br></div><div>I don't want to spend any time thinking a=
bout memory pool transaction replacement until after we pay some technical =
debt:</div><div><br></div><div>+ Memory-limited memory pool, with relay pol=
icy matching block-creation policy</div>
<div>+ Child-pays-for-parent fees</div><div>+ Auto-computed fees, based on =
transactions moving from the memory pool into blocks</div></div><br clear=
=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br>
--e89a8f2356f73a209b04daa2b568--
|
