1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
|
Return-Path: <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ADA890
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4435135
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:59:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.162])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A3DC21B4;
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
t=1444780770; bh=Is1e9YcZaCWYr5T6QZntluMwISi57LZgd9wYeC/eUxQ=;
h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
b=V626P0ctcNCeCZa2sR9l5wvJxdM2FYUui0BucwAFeB35dmsyLc4wDpSnwMkfwu1b9
XPbFMjJeziLNAaHMo9YCLQtlRjKJXsbaKhkgeX0AVXRiezCbJpK0ytewNlSUy0lG3L
U+yifiqTNezLB21v6oT6az8Q1eSIJAjRoSbxp/1g=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla)
with ESMTPSA id DDCB9140145
To: "Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros)" <j@toom.im>
References: <99C42DE7-814A-48F8-AB28-A5ADD77A9FD9@toom.im>
<561D8A81.2020109@riseup.net>
<468C1911-C504-4622-BCC8-FF0AAB17E874@toom.im>
From: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <561D9AD9.7090700@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:59:21 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <468C1911-C504-4622-BCC8-FF0AAB17E874@toom.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, bitcoin-xt@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Memory leaks?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:59:31 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
You wanted advice... you got it
Jonathan Toomim (Toomim Bros):
>
> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:49 PM, odinn
> <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> Signed PGP part It would also help to know what operating
>> system(s) you are using for both the oldie and the freshie.
>
> Linux feather 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt11-1+deb8u3
> (2015-08-04) x86_64 GNU/Linux Linux server 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP
> Debian 3.2.60-1+deb7u3 x86_64 GNU/Linux Linux prime 3.2.0-4-amd64
> #1 SMP Debian 3.2.63-2+deb7u2 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> This excessive memory consumption was seen on 3 machines, all of
> which run Debian. All three machines run p2pool as well as
> bitcoind. Two run XT, one runs Core.
>
>>
>> You should compare this to having set up a node on a completely
>> clean computer.
>
>
> I can't afford to do that. All of the servers I have are being used
> for something. Also, I'm not sure what it is you're trying to test
> for with that suggestion. The numbers I'm reporting are for
> bitcoind's resident set, not for the whole server's memory usage. I
> don't see how other processes running on the same machine are
> relevant unless you are suggesting that RPC calls (e.g.
> getblocktemplate) might be somehow responsible.
>
>>
>> Also, dump your XT, is poo.
>
>
> Not relevant. I addressed this message to both the Core and XT
> lists because the issue appears to affect both forks. Let's keep
> blocksize and governance debates to their own threads, please.
>
> Repeating request: Has anyone else seen something similar? Can you
> report your mempool size and total bitcoind resident set size for
> your running full nodes?
>
- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWHZrZAAoJEGxwq/inSG8CZzQIAKsqKs//Wydv60nXgy5AWAPU
qZ9HuyyWXDKljxzv/Ky5jS7o7B8Ivhnt6zWvkpMTF/R9MLpGrS9jBxXZjHF//ET0
L+eoVrmxwt+rgSjIPSGU/ftF8Jnh1sELecR8FMuCaFR87xraR/7FsJF/233RLWFg
+scNiFEgttyizFNgSq2r1/N3G5e603qXfh0+reaabDX3E+8+PKyUqVaG5E+TUEW0
NIkqi7MuEYd+/Q0SGAYyY/j2BQnebsTB2TbupE/soJkAYqYbCQR8TtrctmwLXTL0
GN+WyWwLYpMio3+7a6oQJ67TBcFxCVmF81zxKM1VIoT0u39VVWeYD1YfxEYFN9Y=
=a6kH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
