summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b5/8e8d796ef4a49369fe8d905957299293c03db0
blob: 695920c5172da24e622fb535dd209b545f8882cb (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11153482
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:51:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com
	[209.85.218.41])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 749E516B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oigd21 with SMTP id d21so104182281oig.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=abRE5I06tQL+wtnuwqsTQpvHxTjN65DrZ9eNbD6b6uk=;
	b=RnMzVUvDZ+8m7BKdYqOPGZg4VYkHFUuTKrZ2TjPH1a1Bw/c3aN9Nyxsib6zjcpkC7k
	2TaDSkIFnh93PYgyWVbxt4a3qh8FeZytrPtwyPTI23G7KlAJvdaqTIiVzIsNQ2V5IyHo
	TiNItN/JKj3TAlqwP6qobsc023u4A2/J3AeScfKGdIjzwJxn9k7j2eRRlPJPUpAveIlS
	1TJgA2W75ipKz8bMjc8ZeSOFYASp9r29PuFAPYcrchBJqbeLUgRydf+0tEn6dCUqH2l5
	n3DThKAmUu0p/LCQORzqCM48U0tKH6ViMhVl7u73cvsm/oqveeb6O1Ug4Lnx7soC503D
	CfIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9zyyyssGG3rvTJ4oUQGuog3FxyaLoahB9xBw+H2OWBkH4sXLMBhJzKZTbCdObzYJc35oa
X-Received: by 10.60.174.39 with SMTP id bp7mr3508616oec.70.1437580293949;
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.1.239] ([204.58.254.99])
	by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	j2sm976280obh.16.2015.07.22.08.51.32
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55A9421B.6040605@jrn.me.uk> <55AC29DB.4060800@jrn.me.uk>
	<CABm2gDr6qXzvcpX_To39kCEsnQNTQS4M5Y40Yk_Lw481rjvSag@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150721130412.GA4551@savin.petertodd.org>
	<20150721135846.GB13429@savin.petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <55AFBBFB.5040101@thinlink.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:51:23 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150721135846.GB13429@savin.petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:51:35 -0000

On 7/21/2015 6:58 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Re: BIP #'s, we explicitly have a policy of allocating them for stupid 
> ideas, to avoid having to be gatekeepers. Ironically that makes it 
> harder to get a BIP # if you know what you're doing, because Gregory 
> Maxwell will argue against you in private and delay actually 
> allocating one if he knows you should know better. :)

Kalle asked for a BIP# for his PoP standardization proposal one month 
ago.   Should he have known better?