summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b5/7f0edf46cc528da0a946a0b5e963cb42b5ba88
blob: b0c6b8703ee36d31cb6c8c30cedb4776aa6ec5e5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Return-Path: <j@toom.im>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1793FB6B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2015 00:56:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA20165
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2015 00:56:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.136] (1-64-179-042.static.netvigator.com
	[1.64.179.42]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id tB90uPtW027329
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:56:28 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_47752164-B5D0-4D28-AB7A-95F91CBF7B05";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jonathan Toomim <j@toom.im>
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDoUiYb1giLd+=8a-tm+0P0+PLJQpQkffe2DZbN0z887Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:56:25 +0800
Message-Id: <9FA8EA6D-91E0-4DA5-8D1F-094787B22797@toom.im>
References: <CAAS2fgQyVs1fAEj+vqp8E2=FRnqsgs7VUKqALNBHNxRMDsHdVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151208110752.GA31180@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<CABm2gDpcek=u=Rpe68EMOq6M7Bji9J=s5VvoQWKRqaQDAP5kTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T1wga3Tandoe2mVGSKdHJytHoc9Ko7HRm2SvJXABEFk9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5666FD8D.8050201@openbitcoinprivacyproject.org>
	<2030FF3C-4F65-44E6-A9D5-9CD144179994@toom.im>
	<CABm2gDoUiYb1giLd+=8a-tm+0P0+PLJQpQkffe2DZbN0z887Ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbMmhcGfsnXKCOQcnbzG/Nez/zqc6aePvG5p5ItOYTMRJqwVUA/FcdKo4kxdXOUJ1Dyc5OqSy0WHC9o1jgKgNEi
X-Sonic-ID: C;qqUPrA+e5RG08f8vZz0oYQ== M;ysh6rQ+e5RG08f8vZz0oYQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:56:33 -0000


--Apple-Mail=_47752164-B5D0-4D28-AB7A-95F91CBF7B05
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_A1D3BDBC-D93D-4813-8C4B-8CFD5785D618"


--Apple-Mail=_A1D3BDBC-D93D-4813-8C4B-8CFD5785D618
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1


On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Jorge Tim=F3n <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:

> I don't undesrtand. SPV nodes won't think they are validating =
transactions with the new version unless they adapt to the new format. =
They will be simply unable to receive payments using the new format if =
it is a softfork (although as said I agree with making it a hardfork on =
the simpler design and smaller fraud proofs grounds alone).
>=20
Okay, I might just not understand how a sigwit payment would look to =
current software yet. I'll add learning about that to my to-do list...

--Apple-Mail=_A1D3BDBC-D93D-4813-8C4B-8CFD5785D618
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=iso-8859-1

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Diso-8859-1"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: =
after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Dec 9, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Jorge =
Tim=F3n &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jtimon@jtimon.cc">jtimon@jtimon.cc</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: =
12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">I =
don't undesrtand. SPV nodes won't think they are validating transactions =
with the new version unless they adapt to the new format. They will be =
simply unable to receive payments using the new format if it is a =
softfork (although as said I agree with making it a hardfork on the =
simpler design and smaller fraud proofs grounds =
alone).</p></blockquote></div>Okay, I might just not understand how a =
sigwit payment would look to current software yet. I'll add learning =
about that to my to-do list...</body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_A1D3BDBC-D93D-4813-8C4B-8CFD5785D618--

--Apple-Mail=_47752164-B5D0-4D28-AB7A-95F91CBF7B05
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWZ3w5AAoJEIEuMk4MG0P1MEQH/jzj2sS5w7mmkhYMNy1asAHq
ub7X38XgERv4E2pEDgIRezR8fqoTd2OMEc0Qr2rcmmU8URExS+f3b+z2YBDp3pJE
laAqMit8PZF51OFY8B1t/2CMUHWGZdNaV1Nbcwdkj3H/TSusG9PAE9p9yWxwtuNm
mkOiut+pYdMSJ8cnUCD5VgTTPJFOq/pyiO7cr+ERFzsEjT01M0ifb1O/9qPDRxJR
a1zKSdBYRjXi68cWnAHFkfDy8kdfOlBJZN7RFXOPU7Ia8dnXbpmj93RzLUgOCiKz
1H7mZoUSRUkWDPPzVB2bhul0RT9HX4uWqqFButQ5AgMtzTq1qPzb97Up83bi1xM=
=addK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_47752164-B5D0-4D28-AB7A-95F91CBF7B05--