summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b2/7b169a961e6b54fcf4dc91d12a9307c8384c11
blob: ce7514d06a015bb7e25cd4bed17f1057c95a6ac8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63F8C0032
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE584198D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7DE584198D
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id suV1fFCH0hg6
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:09:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org 7057A4195D
Received: from cerulean.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
 by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7057A4195D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [124.181.34.14] (helo=[127.0.0.1])
 by cerulean.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2)
 (envelope-from <aj@erisian.com.au>)
 id 1paRFj-0007ri-9J; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:09:00 +1000
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 11:08:55 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
 Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAB3F3Dt_0JB1W-JEEFs5j3HHNGfmXd9uU6civ7Ue8go=+z79Eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPfvXfJQKb7i8GBvTEvTTz-3dU_5mH8jOv8Nm4Q8gPt=KxrqLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAB3F3DveCDz6yy-rd3ttV8+4sMufsvB+9J-qVK95yh9aLYX+Mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZAAqIZZO1KK32Th9@erisian.com.au>
 <CAB3F3DtGpVHkyT_=KLS42rvdP=dgnMvChhR1Rs0BHO5yOEabmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPfvXf+4iX0h-nSuyTai_VvJHkDvAyKtgSk6DsaEwE8N3wnYEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZAcx7oEZxC9BiWvg@erisian.com.au>
 <CAB3F3Dt_0JB1W-JEEFs5j3HHNGfmXd9uU6civ7Ue8go=+z79Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AFEB05FC-5C97-472F-87C3-95F12954711A@erisian.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: -1.0
X-Spam_bar: -
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP for OP_VAULT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:09:05 -0000

On 10 March 2023 4:45:15 am AEST, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev=
@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg> wrote:
>1) OP_FORWARD_SELF is a JET of OP_FLU in the revaulting common case=2E Ma=
ybe
>obvious but I missed this initially and thought it was useful to be point=
ed
>out=2E

That was true for TLUV - iirc "FALSE FALSE 0 TLUV" would preserve the spk =
- but I don't think it's true for OP_FLU: you can't commit to preserving th=
e current script without a way to observe the current script; trying to inc=
lude a copy of the script in the script makes the script size infinite, and=
 trying to include a hash of the script inside the script is cryptographica=
lly infeasible=2E

You could just special case "0 0 OP_FLU" to result in the same script rath=
er than an empty one though, which would avoid the need for a dedicated FWD=
_SELF opcode=2E

(Not convinced calling things Jets when they're unrelated to simplicity ma=
kes sense)

Cheers,
aj

--=20
Sent from my phone=2E