1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1WXCOD-0001mW-KI
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:27:17 +0000
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WXCOB-0006vn-FP
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:27:17 +0000
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id ld10so6905825pab.26
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=wlCuuL+wTVJAK1M/zg5fQNv+IsVqf0KxXZKjKD46Vv8=;
b=Cmbc1NOlaWaNvCP1tVAyPYe79leg8QgvsIQKqh011dvcX32GDVHMsxttbneu50xLJA
ZHJAjhKaWjdybKXxcUU59cruBRGPmt+4/PnYHhlUQdv2/iXN0cir5h+sDv+OxqLLOZOf
uJhHd0LE6acwKZI4WXZdnPSeeTWj6uWFtRER8Nn5jkMHUt9pant4BaywOIObTDavGrjJ
wLqRHLK8ZiI8/jV9ZAAoZJ8w3S94TmCOaElXezvJONRVHy2ka5IW2lNGpZC/srfFx/UL
jPLMUerK+mSxapq16LN51XC5Zwv5w1uJg511WhMrOWg6WuSaSv9Tt84a/3LJ7sbmPaJB
c8Cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkYYE/VdNMraobzJs6S7QV5brgldF0f0FjZkU3huEexNE2Vtfk64JV8dT78m51pchD57K4/
X-Received: by 10.66.164.229 with SMTP id yt5mr32036430pab.67.1396888029452;
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.127.194] (50-0-36-93.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net.
[50.0.36.93]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
sv10sm30491512pbc.74.2014.04.07.09.27.07
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5342D1DB.8060203@monetize.io>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:27:07 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CANEZrP2rgiQHpekEpFviJ22QsiV+s-F2pqosaZOA5WrRtJx5pg@mail.gmail.com> <5342C833.5030906@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTqBfEPXh2dfcL_ke6c0wfXw4qUM1rAYMkAHcAM6mYH+g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTqBfEPXh2dfcL_ke6c0wfXw4qUM1rAYMkAHcAM6mYH+g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WXCOB-0006vn-FP
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 16:27:17 -0000
Right now running a full-node on my home DSL connection (<1Mbps) makes
other internet activity periodically unresponsive. I think we've already
hit a point where resource requirements are pushing out casual users,
although of course we can't be certain that accounts for all lost nodes.
On 04/07/2014 08:53 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1. The resource requirements of a full node are moving beyond the
>> capabilities of casual users. This isn't inherently a problem - after
>> all most people don't grow their own food, tailor their own clothes, or
>> keep blacksmith tools handy in to forge their own horseshoes either.
>
> Right now running a full node consumes about $1 in disk space
> non-reoccurring and costs a couple cents in power per month.
>
> This isn't to say things are all ducky. But if you're going to say the
> resource requirements are beyond the capabilities of casual users I'm
> afraid I'm going to have to say: citation needed.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Put Bad Developers to Shame
> Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
> Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
> Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees_APR
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> .
>
|
