1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Vsctr-0006fV-B5
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:28:15 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.170; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Vsctp-0002rU-Va
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:28:15 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id wp18so5243094obc.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:28:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.87.42 with SMTP id u10mr12584420obz.22.1387218488577;
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.92.72 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:28:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CANAnSg0QnZQ2BNJRYm1SD4HePZJQZy3GuAejLXYH+rLFn34CtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANAnSg0QnZQ2BNJRYm1SD4HePZJQZy3GuAejLXYH+rLFn34CtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:28:08 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VKv-eOohBCsadQ2LtMEBRHVbIZI
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1Fm2cEEXNih7arWoLPNEU4d=y0QZxqi30q+n0wh9nV-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Drak <drak@zikula.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013cba623d21bd04edaaf923
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: zikula.org]
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Vsctp-0002rU-Va
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fees UI warning
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:28:15 -0000
--089e013cba623d21bd04edaaf923
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Drak <drak@zikula.org> wrote:
> It just occurs to me this kind of sad story could be averted if wallets
> implemented a confirmation box if the fee amount seems crazy - for example,
> if it's >10x what the default fee should be, or if it's greater than x% of
> the sending amount.
>
Most good wallets have UI's designed to be safe. Unfortunately this guy was
using brainwallet.org which is by no means a "good" wallet in that sense
(it's not really even a wallet app at all)
I think most of us have expressed displeasure at the existence of this site
before, and I once even asked the guy to stop running it, but he refused.
It's an extremely sharp tool which makes it easy to cut yourself, except it
doesn't look dangerous, it looks like ordinary software designed for
ordinary people.
I don't know how to solve this. Badly designed software that looks
appealing will always be a danger.
--089e013cba623d21bd04edaaf923
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Drak <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:=
drak@zikula.org" target=3D"_blank">drak@zikula.org</a>></span> wrote:<br=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>It just occurs to me this kind of sad story could be =
averted if wallets implemented a confirmation box if the fee amount seems c=
razy - for example, if it's >10x what the default fee should be, or =
if it's greater than x% of the sending amount.<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Most good wallets have UI'=
s designed to be safe. Unfortunately this guy was using <a href=3D"http://b=
rainwallet.org">brainwallet.org</a> which is by no means a "good"=
wallet in that sense (it's not really even a wallet app at all)</div>
<div><br></div><div>I think most of us have expressed displeasure at the ex=
istence of this site before, and I once even asked the guy to stop running =
it, but he refused. It's an extremely sharp tool which makes it easy to=
cut yourself, except it doesn't look dangerous, it looks like ordinary=
software designed for ordinary people.=C2=A0</div>
<div><br></div><div>I don't know how to solve this. Badly designed soft=
ware that looks appealing will always be a danger.</div></div></div></div>
--089e013cba623d21bd04edaaf923--
|