summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ae/de96743fefaab9651274ccf808e7cc6bf5925a
blob: 98e3efb23e9c7d04aba83993da97a01e162a1434 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
Return-Path: <eth3rs@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7491BC0032
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D9D706E6
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:08:57 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 46D9D706E6
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=Qr8h9COk
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URI_DOTEDU=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 7cVHJQ3x3u68
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:08:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA893706E5
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org DA893706E5
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id
 4fb4d7f45d1cf-53da72739c3so2157170a12.3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 20 Oct 2023 22:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697864919; x=1698469719;
 darn=lists.linuxfoundation.org; 
 h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
 :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=w6HSKFi9mZ3KFhO9GuIAzl8gfGeUA4Wm8i+4M5aRgBc=;
 b=Qr8h9COk3wRx82SWl1XWT9f5RSPLM+k3J2OY8laB9t7gAsjByZXmzY/+zFkva/lln3
 cxdNTjUEsqFFChYO8C93SQgxcMOqkHvWVX/Noj1pYyMTD1MYOt/IaLm2JzdKrQkIay2q
 enHkyOPGNOP30xLDwkbC2h9iSrbf4jZl71Up+DQodn7pf0BxYKWM2bLfo/Sn7U1fhuYT
 ToDFBKlGb27y5JMnNguQBhwBEQrNoq3uZs2ijP0j9TIFVfOgn2d6z2F3hEeh2u6s6uEY
 ac4pT9ELfuoIV3G2yNL9IeVe6uY+G22Rdp8D6V2tpOARNzwdubYSlaRl+CC8WS9CAlza
 1nfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697864919; x=1698469719;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
 :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
 :reply-to;
 bh=w6HSKFi9mZ3KFhO9GuIAzl8gfGeUA4Wm8i+4M5aRgBc=;
 b=CHOI9XZXWb+5x5yjZwCqIaaXjWgw/4qHUbDqx/oOqTW/g7cgl+Zhqp3jBSA5lGVCTY
 XCvHnauJ00wahhBriP7DVqoWO3I7kBATXbKvLukh0HVy3vQ8snwy/6FVfs1v0PBX4JmU
 lXYMV6IgWIJAvqilYNGNmQFlAiCRP8ig8LVIqjWTvyZZeWBGH/bLd7L2yMlSAHfYmGgQ
 KkBuzFpomL3Dy4pf5r8Bm8rZ8yzooagE/xXuKLiTtGthRgFkqpa7KTbWxSMT/Bw0mosz
 vCPerdtR742pwpq76ds+SnuBF5Q3uKysJzyFiS6e2//WOhBN3r1UFSXTO2E6zpSF0abM
 Rxzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywr+LPHBPL7UGOVLYN/wKrYRfkBUSBxNVcsPBQ0JwJFCqqoo2gr
 F7lu5kuV52jVBHzBd8Zv78r2tO8ilUaY1u2J+TSnEL/stpE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvVusbL3ebFbd52sfT8S3fnPcAVxNB3ADKBABXf7JX8XKz1rhoEdpHOh1f2od70BKrQSSbQR5ojmwqQk7mEK4=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d655:0:b0:53d:ec2d:3ee5 with SMTP id
 c21-20020a50d655000000b0053dec2d3ee5mr2935961edj.32.1697864919355; Fri, 20
 Oct 2023 22:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 01:08:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEM=y+XDB7GGa5BTAWrQHqTqQHBE2VRyd7VWjEb+zCOMzRP+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for OP_CAT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:08:57 -0000

Hi everyone,

We've posted a draft BIP to propose enabling OP_CAT as Tapscript opcode.
https://github.com/EthanHeilman/op_cat_draft/blob/main/cat.mediawiki

OP_CAT was available in early versions of Bitcoin. It was disabled as
it allowed the construction of a script whose evaluation could create
stack elements exponential in the size of the script. This is no
longer an issue in the current age as tapscript enforces a maximum
stack element size of 520 Bytes.

Thanks,
Ethan

=3D=3DAbstract=3D=3D

This BIP defines OP_CAT a new tapscript opcode which allows the
concatenation of two values on the stack. This opcode would be
activated via a soft fork by redefining the opcode OP_SUCCESS80.

When evaluated the OP_CAT instruction:
# Pops the top two values off the stack,
# concatenate the popped values together,
# and then pushes the concatenated value on the top of the stack.

OP_CAT fails if there are less than two values on the stack or if a
concatenated value would have a combined size of greater than the
maximum script element size of 520 Bytes.

=3D=3DMotivation=3D=3D
Bitcoin tapscript lacks a general purpose way of combining objects on
the stack restricting the expressiveness and power of tapscript. For
instance this prevents among many other things the ability to
construct and evaluate merkle trees and other hashed data structures
in tapscript. OP_CAT by adding a general purpose way to concatenate
stack values would overcome this limitation and greatly increase the
functionality of tapscript.

OP_CAT aims to expand the toolbox of the tapscript developer with a
simple, modular and useful opcode in the spirit of Unix[1]. To
demonstrate the usefulness of OP_CAT below we provide a non-exhaustive
list of some usecases that OP_CAT would enable:

* Tree Signatures provide a multisignature script whose size can be
logarithmic in the number of public keys and can encode spend
conditions beyond n-of-m. For instance a transaction less than 1KB in
size could support tree signatures with a thousand public keys. This
also enables generalized logical spend conditions. [2]
* Post-Quantum Lamport Signatures in Bitcoin transactions. Lamport
signatures merely requires the ability to hash and concatenate values
on the stack. [3]
* Non-equivocation contracts [4] in tapscript provide a mechanism to
punish equivocation/double spending in Bitcoin payment channels.
OP_CAT enables this by enforcing rules on the spending transaction's
nonce. The capability is a useful building block for payment channels
and other Bitcoin protocols.
* Vaults [5] which are a specialized covenant that allows a user to
block a malicious party who has compromised the user's secret key from
stealing the funds in that output. As shown in <ref>A. Poelstra, "CAT
and Schnorr Tricks II", 2021,
https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew/blog/cat-and-schnorr-tricks-ii.html</ref>
OP_CAT is sufficent to build vaults in Bitcoin.
* Replicating CheckSigFromStack <ref> A. Poelstra, "CAT and Schnorr
Tricks I", 2021,
https://medium.com/blockstream/cat-and-schnorr-tricks-i-faf1b59bd298
</ref> which would allow the creation of simple covenants and other
advanced contracts without having to presign spending transactions,
possibly reducing complexity and the amount of data that needs to be
stored. Originally shown to work with Schnorr signatures, this result
has been extended to ECDSA signatures. [6]

The opcode OP_CAT was available in early versions of Bitcoin. However
OP_CAT was removed because it enabled the construction of a script for
which an evaluation could have memory usage exponential in the size of
the script.
For instance a script which pushed an 1 Byte value on the stack then
repeated the opcodes OP_DUP, OP_CAT 40 times would result in a stack
value whose size was greater than 1 Terabyte. This is no longer an
issue because tapscript enforces a maximum stack element size of 520
Bytes.

=3D=3DSpecification=3D=3D

Implementation
<pre>
  if (stack.size() < 2)
    return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_INVALID_STACK_OPERATION);
  valtype vch1 =3D stacktop(-2);
  valtype vch2 =3D stacktop(-1);

  if (vch1.size() + vch2.size() > MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE)
      return set_error(serror, SCRIPT_ERR_INVALID_STACK_OPERATION);

  valtype vch3;
  vch3.reserve(vch1.size() + vch2.size());
  vch3.insert(vch3.end(), vch1.begin(), vch1.end());
  vch3.insert(vch3.end(), vch2.begin(), vch2.end());

  popstack(stack);
  popstack(stack);
  stack.push_back(vch3);
</pre>

The value of MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE is 520 Bytes

=3D=3D Reference Implementation =3D=3D
[Elements](https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/blob/master/src/scri=
pt/interpreter.cpp#L1043)

=3D=3DReferences=3D=3D

[1]: R. Pike and B. Kernighan, "Program design in the UNIX
environment", 1983,
https://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/unix_prog_design.pdf
[2]: P. Wuille, "Multisig on steroids using tree signatures", 2015,
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-July/019233.ht=
ml
[3]: J. Rubin, "[bitcoin-dev] OP_CAT Makes Bitcoin Quantum Secure [was
CheckSigFromStack for Arithmetic Values]", 2021,
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2021-July/019233.ht=
ml
[4]: T. Ruffing, A. Kate, D. Schr=C3=B6der, "Liar, Liar, Coins on Fire:
Penalizing Equivocation by Loss of Bitcoins", 2015,
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=3D10.1.1.727.6262&rep=3D=
rep1&type=3Dpdf
[5]: M. Moser, I. Eyal, and E. G. Sirer, Bitcoin Covenants,
http://fc16.ifca.ai/bitcoin/papers/MES16.pdf
[6]: R. Linus, "Covenants with CAT and ECDSA", 2023,
https://gist.github.com/RobinLinus/9a69f5552be94d13170ec79bf34d5e85#file-co=
venants_cat_ecdsa-md