1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Rmu17-0005lt-QH
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ww0-f53.google.com;
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Rmu16-0003qu-Rn
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 +0000
Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so1166489wgb.10
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.95.131 with SMTP id dk3mr12042215wib.6.1326748974786; Mon,
16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.63.212 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPBPUnruXZC049F8d08LE3BmCG_+L__Ffg95BV_-LtqE3tXfVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPBPUnruXZC049F8d08LE3BmCG_+L__Ffg95BV_-LtqE3tXfVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:22:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0CKJ8W8d4yojhjzQkEzP5j+jsw0i2mY2bLBKXPC5XmBQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Ben Reeves <support@pi.uk.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Rmu16-0003qu-Rn
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP Submission
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:23:01 -0000
--f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Your approach won't work-- OP_ADD is limited to 4-byte operands. Changing
that would require a "hard" blockchain split / entire-network-upgrade.
I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible
> formal BIP review.
>
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT
>
> It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/").
>
> Thank you,
> Ben Reeves
>
--
--
Gavin Andresen
--f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Your approach won't work-- OP_ADD is limited to 4-byte operands. =A0Cha=
nging that would require a "hard" blockchain split / entire-netwo=
rk-upgrade.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_qu=
ote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex=
">
I wish to submit the following draft BIP for discussion and possible<br>
formal BIP review.<br>
<br>
<a href=3D"https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT" target=3D"_blank">h=
ttps://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_M_of_2_DRAFT</a><br>
<br>
It is a proposed alternative to BIP 16 ("/P2SH/").<br>
<br>
Thank you,<br>
Ben Reeves<br></blockquote><div>=A0</div></div>-- <br>--<br>Gavin Andresen<=
br><br>
--f46d0444ee7359295304b6abd157--
|
