1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1USlEG-0006eV-Ds
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:34:08 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.219.50; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-oa0-f50.google.com;
Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.219.50])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1USlEF-0003KO-MM
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:34:08 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n1so2541443oag.37
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.84.135 with SMTP id z7mr144744oby.35.1366277642259; Thu,
18 Apr 2013 02:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.167.169 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 02:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0AYaWnVhrAbMXP0BGhb=CZMg_-PYVzwKbcCoRKC9V2rw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP1yKeQMayFHsEUWtA3=q+v5rPAutjzEFVVHopPGNZ4jGQ@mail.gmail.com>
<453bfc69-b2ab-4992-9807-55270fbda0db@email.android.com>
<CANEZrP0z6W0ZDsytQ7Rcqb5L6rswn1wv8cbR7c383Dmpzu+gyg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPaL=UVJd3mdd0bs6Oo9vFHnv_6RbFowjmp0tD-ZbOzZxJEJ3g@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP3ocAJNoQ3xJqRTL8Gz3_T8xsCPPAvSfEOYpPo76wgbig@mail.gmail.com>
<20130418090444.GA30995@savin>
<CANEZrP0AYaWnVhrAbMXP0BGhb=CZMg_-PYVzwKbcCoRKC9V2rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:34:02 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: eBie3Jy4E3EEQn4Ejf_SyRw_v1o
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0fYN4e03MNoOXe0aevmeGDZRCQozYBHm5ZTL=kgcSiyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a26968873a804da9f4dd1
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1USlEF-0003KO-MM
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anti DoS for tx replacement
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:34:08 -0000
--089e013a26968873a804da9f4dd1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> With the sipaspeed patches it seems ECDSA can be processed on modern cores
> at something like 20,000 signatures per second. So it'd take a bit over 4
> seconds to process all of them (cpu time).
>
Sorry brainfart, s/cores/cpus/. I think the 20k/sec was with full usage of
a hyperthreaded quad core CPU.
--089e013a26968873a804da9f4dd1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Mike Hearn <span dir=3D"=
ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:mike@plan99.net" target=3D"_blank">mike@plan99.n=
et</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-=
left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir=3D"ltr">With the sipaspeed patches it seems ECDSA can be processed=
on modern cores at something like 20,000 signatures per second. So it'=
d take a bit over 4 seconds to process all of them (cpu time).<br></div></b=
lockquote>
<div><br></div><div style>Sorry brainfart, s/cores/cpus/. I think the 20k/s=
ec was with full usage of a hyperthreaded quad core CPU.</div></div></div><=
/div>
--089e013a26968873a804da9f4dd1--
|
