1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
|
Return-Path: <voisine@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A7326C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 May 2016 16:59:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com (mail-yw0-f182.google.com
[209.85.161.182])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC3E178
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 May 2016 16:59:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f182.google.com with SMTP id g133so108341226ywb.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 May 2016 09:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc; bh=ZMGWvzzJnCFqNkoZ4CIeq5ubUUTtJBb/licLL8whvss=;
b=V+IPaC/rSK+6H4UfPi6JRnxcTmPlB4luRIKsmje7V3Kizb3Ls6GHzKLiXBR53Kads3
ITrrtO93ayKgIpKpmixXfyIxsMB6TRtJFaJAZhhHKFpNvCc9tOTzAGbQHwx312ZuLzph
o9Llrwj/xaQzwWw7l2QmNBLr46pQt3zQ4ZeggjwRhLfP/YH/k8JG5AcAs47Y8WLjeqSz
ldXd9JWmCp7MnW4jzApOH87n2Kw7qVoEGM63i27ES0QVHa0ZWG+VCVZUd01b3Eda2Cg2
/Fg+vMcEXTWzmS9rTcyfQJ7YKY3uUB379+JHmX+Wr7i8cdOGu3JrXcTg9KE4osmZe3Mv
AP8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
bh=ZMGWvzzJnCFqNkoZ4CIeq5ubUUTtJBb/licLL8whvss=;
b=XD2gweq9+WHEM5oQ0VwTZeNBliUZDAMGc3DOokmb1vO+r3l3LrLBxg5fWsbFcsP6MF
a7k7vPxhU8F0FNaF2xXi0hbKVrtVNzqf06c70yoFSBYbgA4cei/R1Lk0eERHm9u38L/n
oyxGi+CUH7/aDYNu6nMWgagIOwVd9NPaoqnAoaEv7eCmV1kepb6C9Y5mnd2JiU72t7P1
/528AhXJ4ykdYgtf9sHHVabm8MM93GG6pEtfJkOdC5n89rXL/Kpkb82omCyKSJNL48k+
cZLe3LVq7GvXZIzBEY/fAZTYExoeS48e7TtyCQTebI5v8qPTd0Rnx/RNRov9n8fuA3Di
8RnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWHDybdbx+zcyxmYaSJvUnux7CdW3NqJZX1Hjk1QP1K23jIuq0XCaBULJvhRWCNhOQ1amEHkE9TbY3B1g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.154.77 with SMTP id r74mr8846344ywg.91.1463158775436;
Fri, 13 May 2016 09:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.13.233.2 with HTTP; Fri, 13 May 2016 09:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5735FC99.5090001@satoshilabs.com>
References: <5735D3A4.7090608@mycelium.com> <5735EC17.5040901@satoshilabs.com>
<CACq0ZD4BvvCryYmO-J9Rof-ogQJ1wNLgmUEU596nuTH=-U8Hag@mail.gmail.com>
<5735FC99.5090001@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:59:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD7mLCaoGpcVEp7NfW=6nsEA39tZp+G8oeySygMEyhuwQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
To: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0b8ce40f5f390532bc33f8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:00:18 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bip44 extension for P2SH/P2WSH/...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 16:59:36 -0000
--94eb2c0b8ce40f5f390532bc33f8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
This scheme is independent of the number of accounts. It works with BIP44
as well as BIP43 purpose 0, or any other BIP43 purpose/layout. Instead of
overloading the account index to indicate the type of address, you use the
chain index, which is already being used to indicate what the specific
address chain is to be used for, i.e. receive vs change addresses.
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet <http://breadwallet.com>
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com> wrote:
> On 13/05/16 18:03, Aaron Voisine wrote:
> > I like the idea of specifying the type of address as a bit field flag.
> > 0x80000000 is already used to specify hardened derivation, so 0x40000000
> > would be the next available to specify witness addresses. This is
> > compatible with existing accounts and wallet layouts.
>
> I think this is over-optimization. What is the advantage of
>
> m/0'/0x40000000 instead of m/whatever'/0 ?
>
> But this is off-topic anyway, as we are discussing multiple-accounts per
> wallet layout here, not one-account-per-wallet design.
>
> --
> Best Regards / S pozdravom,
>
> Pavol "stick" Rusnak
> SatoshiLabs.com
>
--94eb2c0b8ce40f5f390532bc33f8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">This scheme is independent of the number of accounts. It w=
orks with BIP44 as well as BIP43 purpose 0, or any other BIP43 purpose/layo=
ut. Instead of overloading the account index to indicate the type of addres=
s, you use the chain index, which is already being used to indicate what th=
e specific address chain is to be used for, i.e. receive vs change addresse=
s.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gma=
il_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div dir=3D"ltr">=
<div><br>Aaron Voisine</div><div>co-founder and CEO<br><a href=3D"http://br=
eadwallet.com" target=3D"_blank">breadwallet</a></div></div></div></div></d=
iv></div></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Pavol Rusna=
k <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:stick@satoshilabs.com" target=3D"=
_blank">stick@satoshilabs.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D=
"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding=
-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">On 13/05/16 18:03, Aaron Voisine wrote:<br>
> I like the idea of specifying the type of address as a bit field flag.=
<br>
> 0x80000000 is already used to specify hardened derivation, so 0x400000=
00<br>
> would be the next available to specify witness addresses. This is<br>
> compatible with existing accounts and wallet layouts.<br>
<br>
</span>I think this is over-optimization. What is the advantage of<br>
<br>
m/0'/0x40000000 instead of m/whatever'/0 ?<br>
<br>
But this is off-topic anyway, as we are discussing multiple-accounts per<br=
>
wallet layout here, not one-account-per-wallet design.<br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
--<br>
Best Regards / S pozdravom,<br>
<br>
Pavol "stick" Rusnak<br>
SatoshiLabs.com<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
--94eb2c0b8ce40f5f390532bc33f8--
|
