1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <edmund.edgar@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61CAB982
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com
[209.85.223.176])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CD8149
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j65so320866979iof.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:00:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=T+9gPaptG8yhSdj7p+naUlcDAMh8qx/1AOuRET8zA6w=;
b=HughO/R22QsTvgO8Kq93pIjpXu6FE94dzfe1enWVNQ9yFrJqeKnowkyYoUIRUrwGWn
E3qzon5S4TeM4J0YFsKbjAu5zAiqaUlFVS3Oz9kS6LISYzzIaFtJG03qhVvJiLepR8sz
p/P4TQHJZ8ErqasfEy190Z0m5M7hQk45DEk6PLE4mVcbteLUMfvjHTn6iPan+z/PBw+S
xOH2V9mXirTJUm6LR7AtmrjKZNlYfIM9U2lMyyeHuBiW5Av8zgbcRp/g/s46jNYcICvm
3DSEWXBxbsqa0i2qw8yrPGLSVvRqHrTweHzhPAGNmREYngrJ1WztGiyYkhZEjfaATBZk
0WEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=T+9gPaptG8yhSdj7p+naUlcDAMh8qx/1AOuRET8zA6w=;
b=P+UCIo/sgd5XuTXst1VmPrrKhi6qQiuXoM0fWqx9I9caItxRmA3980m8yicvqczG2D
APQk6ZcDekstiXdm628YkJh+wUzvOagE+TiHJnjJG7XG+iTgDnZ2mzAsgV8kFz8L77ph
dgWYHhnWmGUB7JNbEgNhPExJJi6960eiHSxW94yvekcm7KsEvHHqJ3laslVIlYH8apkJ
q+SdaGfyGXhPxo8GtJat/A+VtN+dVJKiJs1W+iC/RUYECIPSW5fEm/kujQ/3DSz/gkt/
O9hbeWU7FmZLxQ9mzZ7vxt0K8zNP1sKA74PIKIC6xFV67ldS2uQSyuI8+zVIqEMOXpU7
iVAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02Fl64Q7Mi/qwzrU1itO0PEcLFByyxKTKkMhHEPvp37GV4Wp4raGOrHfgg6sAS6j52HQUjLLmIZGXc97Q==
X-Received: by 10.36.142.1 with SMTP id h1mr26247645ite.44.1480464044511; Tue,
29 Nov 2016 16:00:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: edmund.edgar@gmail.com
Received: by 10.36.66.74 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:00:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADn+-hkarmEEJyzE67DSajTK3koTkKuna2kwVHuZkzHDxp6SZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADn+-hkarmEEJyzE67DSajTK3koTkKuna2kwVHuZkzHDxp6SZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edmund Edgar <ed@realitykeys.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:00:43 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ymRQTK_od2IpOg35rUWW4HZYIGA
Message-ID: <CA+su7OVvPdW+ZHBX3nkcpRENhZOzYtPVo-jQqo0QMMPDqTJstw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:38:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP idea: Standardised p2sh bitcoin addresses
requiring an arbitrary and/or combination of keys
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:46 -0000
On 30 November 2016 at 05:56, Erland Lewin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This proposal describes a consistent way to create s type of p2sh address=
es
> (=E2=80=9CBoolean addresses=E2=80=9D) which can be redeemed by an arbitra=
ry set of keys and
> multi signatures combined with logical and/or operations.
From our point of view at Reality Keys ( https://www.realitykeys.com )
I can confirm that
1) The pain point this proposal aims to fix is indeed painful.
2) This would be very helpful, if wallet authors actually adopt it.
3) The implementation as described so far looks sensible.
--=20
--=20
Edmund Edgar
Founder, Social Minds Inc (KK)
Twitter: @edmundedgar
Linked In: edmundedgar
Skype: edmundedgar
http://www.socialminds.jp
Reality Keys
@realitykeys
ed@realitykeys.com
https://www.realitykeys.com
|
