path: root/a9/30a0cfd38111882271e1ec714d6b1c4dbb7b2a

Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53BAC001E
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9142A4010F
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:48:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id xo4NF7oiMDNR
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:48:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 01:09:56 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from 4.mo548.mail-out.ovh.net (4.mo548.mail-out.ovh.net
 [188.165.42.229])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95106400F3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:48:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.138.84])
 by mo548.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DBB5209C2;
 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:21:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.104) by DAG6EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.51)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.18; Fri, 14 Jan
 2022 14:21:42 +0100
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
 (GARM-104R005bfe13370-1f5c-4094-b99d-12075011879a,
 3A1C7349D80F2434CA8BC385CDA32872B2645AFB) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.100.97
To: jack <jack@squareup.com>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
 <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>, Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de>
References: <MtHvJYE--J-2@tutanota.de>
 <F3DA4333-E4BB-4A3F-B050-AA142465F2C8@squareup.com>
From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <d1489dc9-e919-fc29-13ac-fcde96f34c50@peersm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:21:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F3DA4333-E4BB-4A3F-B050-AA142465F2C8@squareup.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.104]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG4EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.32) To DAG6EX1.mxp6.local
 (172.16.2.51)
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 506566d8-9d01-497a-805c-b52f81fbbff7
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 8711932004313621472
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrtdehgdehvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfhisehtqhertddtfeehnecuhfhrohhmpeethihmvghrihgtucggihhtthgvuceorgihmhgvrhhitgesphgvvghrshhmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuffdvudeivdehtdfhfedtjeduvdetfeeukeehffduieeggedvteeiuedtieefteenucffohhmrghinheplhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhrghenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhhvghlohepmhigphhlrghniedrmhgrihhlrdhovhhhrdhnvghtpdhinhgvtheptddrtddrtddrtddpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddprhgtphhtthhopehjrggtkhesshhquhgrrhgvuhhprdgtohhm
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:22:17 +0000
Cc: info@bitcoindefensefund.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 15:48:20 -0000

(P2P?) Electronic Cash (Defense?) Fund or Electronic Cash Foundation ?
More neutral, potentially covering others than Bitcoin, mimicking a bit
EFF (even if as stated US is not the only target), referring to
Satoshi's paper where everything started

Maybe I am not up to date but it would be good to know what are the
current procedures with the Tulip thing

Aymeric


Le 13/01/2022 =E0 19:20, jack via bitcoin-dev a =E9crit :
> Hi Prayank,
>
>> On 13 Jan 2022, at 10:13, Prayank <prayank@tutanota.de> wrote:
>> I had few suggestions and feel free to ignore them if they do not make=
 sense:
>>
>> 1.Name of this fund could be anything and 'The Bitcoin Legal Defense F=
und' can be confusing or misleading for newbies. There is nothing officia=
l in Bitcoin however people believe things written in news articles and s=
ome of them might consider it as an official bitcoin legal fund.
> Excellent point. Will come up with a better name.
>
>> 2.It would be better if people involved in such important funds do not=
 comment/influence soft fork related discussions. Example: Alex Morcos ha=
d some opinions about activation mechanism during Taproot soft fork IIRC.=

> Yes. Will think through this and board operating principles we can shar=
e publicly, which would probably include criteria for how cases are chose=
n, to protect against this board and fund influencing direction.
>
> Open to ideas and suggestions on all.
>
> jack
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev