1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD522C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59D6417AE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Rs55ljkOnvYp
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8D341766
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id t11so17332713ybi.6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=jtimon-cc.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=KbhrrQddVgbKTQRjmABN/s0Tk5Viu0nshwxTOMIMlos=;
b=KxJIYjAxH71OYkC8i9fURmagOklh8JyzCwkad5jt2Wvfa9GqLgvCrtSM/UiDScZXhN
GP1gvu9DF10gV4bUtuj25aeUsic/DQsULynnlJbquvGNueE+aw5sb8L4VZS5ug2sHxVO
GVa/Pqvbe73Dzj8U48mQOCqRQAyJK65csr+CwH+hORA5gGbC0TIqqDDUrBP3Nztv09YX
2PCFPnWPpRWKiLfK0+15SQLgQJDOhxVvXKvdU40+9ZNj6CswEmb65xecXWliUnVx1VNn
ceEe1ClQCiq3BgxzHZyjTIBclW5FGCLUkEP/1V3+q59UX3GsXh+yKJYh0fbavfySkeyp
XDUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=KbhrrQddVgbKTQRjmABN/s0Tk5Viu0nshwxTOMIMlos=;
b=RK56FVCB7Gv36BDzWK8A9BzkbrO82h2P06ujxEo4FQEXq1bo6VhuqzZPhmM1VH9df6
jUYRY5wtImzuZO1CJlUV8UJSdoRpPniK7HSuaM7oqXSAYf19ZD/mvGWO/pcKJhHFdNqa
6lPWDY8iFp5PikeUSUa33Ik/mLZtB8HofzOTyLBO1sMUIm5QLuvSPrDozM4Nxtye+Feg
pA2C54a1e2lIfDdQw37QcnjHAOfVjkD9Urt1SBO9aPvSJFnBWxsUF3lZADrR07WI4TeR
YdByaHJvbLVWe0lkL1+JgWZqlFCzixtbKGZcxd+EEy4E4eCv+nBfxsAz84s/trGh19zZ
1Liw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vs9+nEbZnX47NxgtYzlssI8LNytvQBezKDSvDg8hUfTxK77MS
MLTmcGvPNGVeVaG4BYbq3PuqviOBzRcg56GYpzDumg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymkUdc5gIrdkv7RPoF9WlI4udBS01EVlgT+EBmcImX87WhVcu7++vzLwOM56urFtwQNVStNf3HZh9ghXKohl8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:7d1:0:b0:628:d9f7:c5b8 with SMTP id
t17-20020a5b07d1000000b00628d9f7c5b8mr11888222ybq.347.1647628575316; Fri, 18
Mar 2022 11:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMZUoKkTDjDSgnqhYio8Lnh-yTdsNAdXbDC9RQwnN00RdbbL6w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDrdoD3QZ=gZ_nd7Q+AZpetX32dLON7pfdC4aAwpLRd4xA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoK=kpZZw++WmdRM0KTkj6dQhmtsanm9eH1TksNwypKS8Zw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDpFFg47Ld3HHhTq2SVTaCusm1ybDpEmvKV=S3cFTAQwoA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoKkPF6gPGpDWy1U+0GCONF-_qsTcOz0S1X+vx8_Kfqr8mw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD5xwhgYUgYd001NXrCq-H7qCJuifChN+jF98KGbKFbENT3J+Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhgYUgYd001NXrCq-H7qCJuifChN+jF98KGbKFbENT3J+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 19:36:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrvgUUs_T3Yk5W9cnM3X4PPVcU_3+K=KTC+uRwNYxCa0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Rubin <j@rubin.io>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:51:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Speedy Trial
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:36:18 -0000
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:25 PM Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> Boker tov bitcoin devs,
I don't undesrtand what that means, sorry
>> A mechanism of soft-forking against activation exists. What more do you want?
>
>
> Agreed -- that should be enough.
No, resistance should ideally be a priori, not a posteriori.
>
>>
>> Are we supposed to write the code on behalf of this hypothetical group of users who may or may not exist for them just so that they can have a node that remains stalled on Speedy Trial lockin?
>>
>> That simply isn't reasonable, but if you think it is, I invite you to create such a fork.
>
>
> Disagree.
>
> It is a reasonable ask.
>
> I've done it in about 40 lines of python: https://github.com/jeremyrubin/forkd
>
> Merry Christmas Jorge, please vet the code carefully before running.
40 lines of python code should be easy to bet even if the author was
very bad at writing readable code and obfuscated his code on purpose.
I don't know if it's the case, because, sorry, I'm not reviewing your
code at the moment.
"Vet the code carefully before running" strikes me as arrogant and
condescending. as if you were implying my engineering capacity was
very limited. If you say these things to me publicly, I can only only
imagine what you have told other devs behind my back about my capacity
(or even my ideology) if they ever asked (or perhaps without them
asking). I really hope you haven't lied to anyone about my ideology,
J.
Perhaps I do have "prosectution complex" with you indeed. Not with
Russel, but with you.
After all, I've publicly say I don't trust you, haven't I?
But, again, what do I know about psychology?
Going back on topic, the reason I won't review your code is because
you have rushed a design before understanding the analysis.
No, I'm not asking for a stalled mechanism for speedy trial, I don't
want speedy trial.
We disagree on the analysis of the problem to solve, that's why we
disagree on the design for the solution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_development_life_cycle#Analysis
Anyway, perhaps I look at the code in the future if your proposal
consensus change seems to prosper.
Regarding "merry christmas"...what the f are you talking about? it's
not Christmas time and neither you or me are christians, are you?
If this is some sort of riddle or joke, we really must have very
different senses of humor, because I don't get it.
Come on, J, let's both try to stay on topic or people will start to
correctly point out that we both negatively discriminate each other
for offtopic reasons, be them reasonably justified or not.
> Peace,
Ama, y ensancha el alma.
> Jeremy
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
