1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
|
Return-Path: <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690FD722
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 May 2016 15:00:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.sldev.cz (mail.sldev.cz [51.254.7.247])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2276212F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 May 2016 15:00:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C77E589;
Fri, 13 May 2016 15:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sldev.cz
Received: from mail.sldev.cz ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mail.sl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 6RLuebV_GLk7; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from tetra.site (unknown [10.8.8.107])
by mail.sldev.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44CECE462;
Fri, 13 May 2016 15:01:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Daniel Weigl <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <5735D3A4.7090608@mycelium.com>
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@satoshilabs.com>
Message-ID: <5735EC17.5040901@satoshilabs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:00:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5735D3A4.7090608@mycelium.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bip44 extension for P2SH/P2WSH/...
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:00:44 -0000
On 13/05/16 15:16, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 2) Define a new derivation path, parallel to Bip44, but a different 'purpose' (eg. <BipNumber-of-this-BIP>' instead of 44'). Let the user choose which account he want to add ("Normal account", "Witness account").
We had quite a long discussion in our team some time ago and we agreed
on that option #2 is much better and we'd like to implement this way in
myTREZOR.
> +) Wallet needs only to take care of 1 address per public key
True, if this BIP only supports P2WPKH.
P2WSH should probably be handled by another account type and another
BIP, anyway.
> Has any Bip44 compliant wallet already done any integration at this point?
We have something in the pipeline, but no visible results yet.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol "stick" Rusnak
SatoshiLabs.com
|
