1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
Return-Path: <decker.christian@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D35F4A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 1 May 2018 17:35:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C834F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 1 May 2018 17:35:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a8so18741028wmg.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version;
bh=GiZUNy+Iptfg3lgsK84qNEmiNncAKyvFywTbQU4D3mA=;
b=s42IJ4gtASMKuUcazCfV/KCW/LJ7bduWMiQaA3DpdWh7jh5Cy/lxujzz8f8JR2OhhJ
OCmOv/dflCCd9i67BL/DOb93oCbAw6em40U+IC6Nld/6m9EDTLDrom51bOM9L3xkTzgn
3qYKKsC54rlg8i6kwb0aF71jAkOQfgOk6klSXs5+PnnkXpbE/M+Az1y21mIQZ10QRsRm
8XNflyKcy0V5HF9Tw8L1v1Aw8ESuHex+roN+QK/S6i/iRUx96Qsquz38FzOSfPHyVhhT
7XVz+qd6OFeA3IE2Va+9RWneS0ZLUIApsy8hDZnwaklvQO5oMGk1CPm71vmiNE5qXzPl
qgpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:mime-version;
bh=GiZUNy+Iptfg3lgsK84qNEmiNncAKyvFywTbQU4D3mA=;
b=D+xvdsHR2eUA10IH3r3qdrIek7WDuR+WBGoDnzCPBmUml/XOcJ8kRXa38rt8FKhraO
uVeeK/ilFxH4xdrjWYbHc4VfV1JWMOTKRljCYTHrWZihfW6bPMQDRYjD9+b91KT/lfTV
lv03FDY8IGVhVISbV3BGdYyjSuECDnfdBq72Yw58nFoYC3P+mXXYDpYyKBuGhdOlTdIe
IA4KwzjamKJZLpu2dI8PtNzYyUg0lbw4SStrO0MZoWu2UqDu5CdkjXlDXwKS4F3q7574
0ffMJdNWGmU4JaGiAScTSie3tYKbBsEI4YVqUwt6y+nkwIsQWjHdTjeMoX6GqjyV88LO
rO4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAjcox6ZbMPfBKZDqaz86v2QHw/oVuZaBSx6P3ltZ006Rxql9ze
1EHFjOhcq1JGoLx81Sy29Tv+iwt7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrKrXLREVH4yJN/hjBD4Ijhe1hseUFlauTibIkntyTCaQHDMyef7lGa9ajq+v8HHZ7UgIxU2g==
X-Received: by 10.28.176.194 with SMTP id z185mr9662519wme.45.1525196121528;
Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2a02:aa16:1102:5480:e99:3f63:40a2:83e9])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
r6-v6sm4056608wrg.73.2018.05.01.10.35.20
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 01 May 2018 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com>
To: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@blockstream.io>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoK=V9Dii7ja6n6mpW_tWt00PuT=-9Z8XoyKOY3y0_AwK5w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <871sewirni.fsf@gmail.com>
<CAMZUoK=V9Dii7ja6n6mpW_tWt00PuT=-9Z8XoyKOY3y0_AwK5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 19:32:32 +0200
Message-ID: <877eongu33.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP sighash_noinput
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 17:35:23 -0000
Russell O'Connor <roconnor@blockstream.io> writes:
> At the risk of bikeshedding, shouldn't NOINPUT also zero out the
> hashSequence so that its behaviour is consistent with ANYONECANPAY?
Good catch, must've missed that somehow. I'll amend the BIP accordingly.
|
