summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a5/92bd3b9552271882f43a208c7363ff9f58252d
blob: d9037854d7bac50097adb8cad8a844404ee0bb16 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDE8C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670AC840F8
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 670AC840F8
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=petertodd.org
 header.i=@petertodd.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm1 header.b=ae4vCf4e; 
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
 unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=M1YGSgJC
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.802
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id zoKi5-H5jKvl
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:29:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 70083840F4
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.21])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70083840F4
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:29:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5835D32004F8;
 Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:29:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:29:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petertodd.org;
 h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to
 :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender
 :subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1657474193; x=1657560593; bh=Or
 /nd1gdg35RkVL5psuiZBZlrkhMpeW3paCy/T2gIKs=; b=ae4vCf4eZN49fEgWKu
 uPlcpuoZH/R+SNDSHaqF4aOdn311MO5g3PLvfctSPgirv7rN2FEVLqgU3x51Wh0A
 /qauDY/euxj0KG4IIDM4qGyK8LhT693Nx+UT3kf6cZv3ZDg/5AeOenaWUmiprG1V
 YVwOHPlMfBcbB75nKNuXJFXo3okqge7S3IScCnnwyljerO6dymHGr5pf40e/PhjH
 3dZ6ucf6Aa2j8lAuM89U8MMMHbtPQ+HT5m/87a8T2C0xNYEu45GXxpjk6adHQNEV
 vsBAt8CpZYxkA33IaPszt3qV3sJ3RrqXutXbiPrfTe/IoLboakyOtypDiUeqH4l0
 gl7A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
 :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
 :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm3; t=1657474193; x=1657560593; bh=Or/nd1gdg35RkVL5psuiZBZlrkhM
 peW3paCy/T2gIKs=; b=M1YGSgJCsZX4IK8kxGa1erAKejbSE8JQjyEkBPWI4jmR
 BNOeC/j8TETsJgcGgJEj6TBeVp63gHD26P9UNLiJdv6WwOryjkywZ3Fc1Av449A7
 dNwZM/Bf5X2ToFF2WfAK/An4wRzPp2wNStDLnx7lfUkfIOiYeCU4fiGOx24aulQG
 XmVS/gxCPDbSuWHQCvfIJ04J4/kFwgyqG3gx+l/yRbrvZBz+xd8cpG3eKurRkd4b
 sCjzksJTcDTN2gUKfNZxc9VLfm4zHngLiYIqLkk9O69YhGIRdwt4wwjUW+2EY1eX
 egLMKNtTLI8McZeQ4ArAG3F3RystAautZB66JQULHg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:kQzLYvuQZQF_1bHrm97ULSQ3bW3lAgpQdC_9sE_uKbLxy0YDeZIKRw>
 <xme:kQzLYgdZ2nGmP6w7FhTUOo8-XEgUlvyHiZ_VFseZ4PGkaJc_8Q0IKNqLZdlXCUmES
 oD2cc1iHQHMmW7310M>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:kQzLYiyKyMF3ClU6sMsBfHKP7UpAE4jXdMsHtvLbazIsyyZ9JGhm3Xce4IxsjODC65kVebVKzFeVpaLnvLrCsaH4g2vtI0kB1XH67A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejuddgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod
 ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh
 necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesgh
 dtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgvrhcuvfhougguuceophgvthgvsehpvghtvghr
 thhouggurdhorhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelvdellefftddukeduffejgfefje
 euheeileeftdfgteduteeggeevueethfejtdenucffohhmrghinhepphgvthgvrhhtohgu
 ugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh
 hmpehushgvrhesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:kQzLYuPI-XtmT6UbRNzYeJGbpGIcNA6fM02wVAQZDi-oqvMzw-Q2wA>
 <xmx:kQzLYv8-XnvihGSt03PkgVovj_zuxOPmbiJDRyX1x50nj5unYqRtsw>
 <xmx:kQzLYuWItOmglzsPjbdrCrRc8dncVl98lMLhzvt0qwt_Syc2ZXyawQ>
 <xmx:kQzLYpntHUC05xwlfLVl2v7_uHvV-Y-BS5DEwcue7sbMeQcoldnHIQ>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun,
 10 Jul 2022 13:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 41F2C5F87C; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 13:29:51 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <YssMj9KTiBi7KeuW@petertodd.org>
References: <D50AEC8C-4EEC-4C17-8626-87C651F1AA66@voskuil.org>
 <6xuj-ljJ9hvME-TIgWHmfPpad4aJ-1zTYSH1NBuFL_gi-6hJHMayWLEAhcEyw_lqmkR24ee8uMIAH6n4TDguk_5fJ8och99Em3m5y1R6brE=@protonmail.com>
 <eFdBAPulC6BoW5zBt30Mq4fXhnRzVENMjsfGrj1Yzbi-Z-wje21pCwEpMQ6Tc27m8LdhMN_66UX3Ze1BNAU9rsgqF-1JRV40s1QU9zSJ6js=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U+h7QdRS1PPsfSrc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eFdBAPulC6BoW5zBt30Mq4fXhnRzVENMjsfGrj1Yzbi-Z-wje21pCwEpMQ6Tc27m8LdhMN_66UX3Ze1BNAU9rsgqF-1JRV40s1QU9zSJ6js=@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:29:58 -0000


--U+h7QdRS1PPsfSrc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 02:17:36PM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi ZmnSCPxj,
>=20
>=20
> > Thus, we should instead prepare for a future where the block subsidy mu=
st be removed, possibly before the existing schedule removes it, in case a =
majority coalition of miner ever decides to censor particular transactions =
without community consensus.
> > Fortunately forcing the block subsidy to 0 is a softfork and thus easie=
r to deploy.
>=20
> `consensus.nSubsidyHalvingInterval` for mainnet in [chainparams.cpp][1] c=
an be decreased to 195000. This will reduce the number of halvings from 34 =
to 14 and subsidy will be 0 when it becomes less than 0.01 although not sur=
e if this will be a soft fork.

What exactly would the benefit be of going through all the political headac=
he
of a soft fork for what I assume you are thinking would be an insignificant
change in total miner revenue?

Or do you think total transaction fees at that point would be less than
0.01BTC?

--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

--U+h7QdRS1PPsfSrc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=jJT+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--U+h7QdRS1PPsfSrc--