blob: c425b1df0503576d3fac39d32c01b4180fe56c32 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <stick@gk2.sk>) id 1WDdSl-0005Gv-O8
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:19:07 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-ea0-f170.google.com ([209.85.215.170])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WDdSf-0004El-Jm
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:19:07 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g15so2798525eak.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=hEuwp9TZ3oloOBXvbb4G7UrawGFXiOOouzEt65DObGE=;
b=NaY7WGOa9RC6BwG1yLZFqILE9wxeJECHTELoRzQB/1YRRdfvxjowaRa0ecDe/AVNmk
0yXkFlE6gTqgnwPJEYnyRJYZ+UM2QwgOlO5dqhaSqju9QG/jt6KLSzC0O1+2K0v9SRjW
9iplkIYLasxIcsBv1YiM28QK3fW4/HWwX05WrX7j1JNqZ+RCZSTOQWR4XRIKEHimJVlR
FMDcIEymrMc+4C637K8CBNCuYtwkvA6xFYlS9T4uqjFPHHFOb7/e/W70G/hyNSGrbPIu
/FzG/4YawtZr8OkeBqVG+1LpdczldWCdS1TfkG99UE+MOEwqlGKibbr5rKtiBmxUcW6f
G1/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmY4lufXC1V48uUGXulZ8Z1vJ2kbRNBlJJ/WoPP5J/dpeimv/oypP3ubx432YVMNFTYKXfd
X-Received: by 10.14.204.9 with SMTP id g9mr4418700eeo.82.1392224198783;
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
o43sm83265334eef.12.2014.02.12.08.56.36
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52FBA7C3.4060603@gk2.sk>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:56:35 +0100
From: Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CAPg+sBgPG+2AMbEHSRQNFn6FikbRzxkWduj5MSZLz-O6Wh940w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBgPG+2AMbEHSRQNFn6FikbRzxkWduj5MSZLz-O6Wh940w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WDdSf-0004El-Jm
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] [BIP proposal] Dealing with
malleability
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:19:08 -0000
On 02/10/2014 12:33 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> The proposed document is here: https://gist.github.com/sipa/8907691
If we are bumping nVersion, how about dropping DER encoding completely
and using just 64 bytes directly for signature?
Also using 2 different variable integer encodings (in addition to what
DER already does) is very confusing.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
|
