1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4028CB68
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com
[209.85.217.182])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4906227
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id j17so82665575uag.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 May 2017 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=cwTFdQFdQ4Kvdem9g6nbpkQkpYOQbAdMop7qowDpLAI=;
b=vhzkUqXrkaf0TZDHCGECjfq84X0TEDU5IFYEQVKJQVlZ3CXY/pDYFkLnGE7nEp6dOU
nVDwL9b5k8zjjzd8/QTjGpV15OkKULoMkPq9ekMhLK1DNWjYz44hluOPrkslVhu+Nnps
BnODfWpaAGWhQl5lRSmnB19IkKEg9vrwuJzjjrxEfIj4WwJuuUg/lXfEOE8auLgPEXRl
ovaHKPQ+o4dILlTXMCTQGCdqMc46wa5bpzSJHeHdfGihSFyB8Hk9lK7DuYfwaOLlHpM+
4YNmvvqivgciQ6TTHGP6rvNZfFL1Se9lwTurVbUwQiYatMZE5axLfTD7ue2xXf1MbMbg
NHHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject
:to; bh=cwTFdQFdQ4Kvdem9g6nbpkQkpYOQbAdMop7qowDpLAI=;
b=sJBMtnaNR60ytPs69s7mkzzC9h89kLVu1e9UEo0xk/qUIia2NlaR2++fWndkxryr6R
O+3dDPKSehjLy8j77Wdao2W/oNWJ7E3NGc6/sFJEsw1L/mT+k57rpc1ZCcVBDprKE3Vw
Y4q+HRmzOIfll/+8K3J621THomrGrM2XjzJ1CX4VmKE8Gs72072w6AYu6gehFkNSVcl5
pvPv+ULF1DuuDe7kplbVkPueggmfXByrF+Q4s57h23ZtJCEtCOw6yE/jfZyPI9UdZ0sr
o0Xxl/03H07alRuPvXTIzAAd6ndTAiX3t5NB9gzwXhcOx4YOVMIfUXP7RFbu/H8L8QXb
mtbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCvqiVWNjzaiBhlkKdFJYszBSmcE7tnJMZDKBzWo8Jq2iiz3Gdq
9pUI2n5220dY4R6+mO0enAeea6wBcw==
X-Received: by 10.176.4.85 with SMTP id 79mr13680130uav.88.1495561812897; Tue,
23 May 2017 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.103.20.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 May 2017 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:12 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: t4fPhqrsUjtw1YOi2AmWXnh_yNI
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQNPvEuta0KubeDetgYxGhWvdGK10jig0y4ayv0EvZPLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP149 timeout-- why so far in the future?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 17:50:14 -0000
Based on how fast we saw segwit adoption, why is the BIP149 timeout so
far in the future?
It seems to me that it could be six months after release and hit the
kind of density required to make a stable transition.
(If it were a different proposal and not segwit where we already have
seen what network penetration looks like-- that would be another
matter.)
|
