1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F14CC002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:54:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD1983FC2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:54:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 7DD1983FC2
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=dpnrD+Jp
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id T-xvvN5nbmbz
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:54:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org B9DB283FA6
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DB283FA6
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:54:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id bp15so28229785lfb.13
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 06:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=+bW/sCV989+hfkmM8b9IPCWJ3+OU1dnNPeuKOSQ7ttY=;
b=dpnrD+Jpd+AMkymXdS0t8wr5rcJhBlUhuGpaXzcG2R2QfECC5eGgXGaU45KZGaZQeO
1ATJSIaiKpfNqIiH4r9AL2sGkgv50SZMBAitX8JL5y0DocSjLgqkOqDpwrU2pPzjrIsH
tcniy7fjQfUa3PYDa6rBvIOgR+tT19scn9m8yn5uUamO4Ulh6BWQ/uU7VyuzQ8Ga17wi
fHFqHVg0l3gJ91V6fAjCsH4idYeF5RhvKHF+HjM4uM13eQ4lCNetV7JnLYWnYUAkZqlQ
SyYjxCqXqT8SsNAVfG3vw3evld3/aegJ60889hcbc3/OCrkgHTNI0ZHdI3gyfPy0w63i
+8Og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=+bW/sCV989+hfkmM8b9IPCWJ3+OU1dnNPeuKOSQ7ttY=;
b=p/UMjwoYxx/m1Ku2I5byO4JnsdYKMaN+e05zwmBqYH4b2gZVRoUiFrnhrcDVP3kiNs
/xaUAemif8ntg/MCwP15uLcRwxkR3xkvwGvLort2iG1OHImk/rRTcUYry002IAXPDZRi
fkc50CAngd7vRi+A95WbnMs9EHiLfQnyHd/bYnAUiFvQb2L1ZJOgBWfCF2VOlVxZo+2M
jkGDiO4Rwo4XaMKFnUbO82J9AK1GlTkSxnCXLNGfDLeq3khA1RkoMKMLczqohyPFyvfA
JV9CTSrkoMaqU8+CSuexnSMB0FnK9foxwI33onIjuoYPFd/DqONhXv4MsTMK3tIW/x7p
XU4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2FGbblUL04SJv7qD9GOqxbMU/2axdC613frFR1zMGu+1rWpaoV
1QwbVpdpptez51WKSzhhCP0VegcZXlH3N1iCnEE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6q22HA58a2H0Zw+MKjcpuQhxB7RNNkd/vajftN57zt2kcW3IC8DgIHwW+4LiwQD7uUKovAoHcXWZYx1qlB8/I=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4f03:0:b0:496:272:625d with SMTP id
k3-20020ac24f03000000b004960272625dmr2767204lfr.303.1666187665310; Wed, 19
Oct 2022 06:54:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <mOBAWIbHTgkSrCJ9IEBJgArqUNYcNSDQawhUzaiYyliaPDQT_YDfI5CLoDPZgEt43mePJof-CJfxzFxgXMUe6ONDJ4j5Bzk1QGjd50S9gb8=@mm-studios.com>
In-Reply-To: <mOBAWIbHTgkSrCJ9IEBJgArqUNYcNSDQawhUzaiYyliaPDQT_YDfI5CLoDPZgEt43mePJof-CJfxzFxgXMUe6ONDJ4j5Bzk1QGjd50S9gb8=@mm-studios.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 08:54:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBaxCkJvNqojEX3q7bCg857dCGUwD-XRuAKw7315aL6c-BQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: mm-studios <mm@mm-studios.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb8bb905eb638b75"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] brickchain
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 13:54:30 -0000
--000000000000eb8bb905eb638b75
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:34 AM mm-studios via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Fully filled brick B0, with a hash that doesn't meet the difficulty rule,
> would be broadcasted and nodes would have it on in a separate fork as usual.
>
Check out the previous "weak block" proposals:
https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bitcoin/weak-blocks-links.2016-05-09.txt
- Bryan
https://twitter.com/kanzure
--000000000000eb8bb905eb638b75
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi,</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"l=
tr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 6:34 AM mm-studios via bit=
coin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitco=
in-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style=3D"font-family:Arial;font-size:=
14px">Fully
filled brick B0, with a hash that doesn't meet the difficulty rule,=20
would be broadcasted and nodes would have it on in a separate fork as=20
usual.<br></div></blockquote><div>=C2=A0</div><div>Check out the previous &=
quot;weak block" proposals:<br><a href=3D"https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc=
/bitcoin/weak-blocks-links.2016-05-09.txt">https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/bit=
coin/weak-blocks-links.2016-05-09.txt</a><br></div><div><br></div></div><di=
v dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">- Bryan<br><a href=
=3D"https://twitter.com/kanzure" target=3D"_blank">https://twitter.com/kanz=
ure</a></div></div></div>
--000000000000eb8bb905eb638b75--
|
