summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a1/afdc78d58c55980f58e5299bac236e0c4c832a
blob: 12d01e62c59e8c720f3a2f2f24f98c174bed0cd1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EE0ABA
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  9 Jul 2015 06:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145FB0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  9 Jul 2015 06:23:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
	(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E950108039B;
	Thu,  9 Jul 2015 06:22:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:voisine@gmail.com::2e5399QOOs8SyqVo:bFIvn
X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::EXUjAQzOym=cJSx6:b4YmD
X-Hashcash: 1:25:150709:DKBryant@gmail.com::+eA2it78EvgeGNUr:FzPd
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 06:22:42 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.1-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAAUFj10D37A1kfqFNPWz6bOMYSFXQbecJ+RxxOnw6HtwUg70mg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201507060424.57070.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CACq0ZD4PCSXMjZDXNS134ZWTSOaNGktKQd47q+6ncV-uRhS+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACq0ZD4PCSXMjZDXNS134ZWTSOaNGktKQd47q+6ncV-uRhS+YQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201507090622.43214.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] REQ BIP # / Discuss - Sweep incoming unconfirmed
	transactions with a bounty.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 06:24:00 -0000

On Thursday, July 09, 2015 6:17:03 AM Aaron Voisine wrote:
> Do you have any idea how much hashing power is using CPFP? It's a useful
> metric for wallet developers to know what sort of confirmation times they
> might be able to get when attempting to use it.

Not sure. At least 4% (Eligius)?