1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C3213E9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com (mail-ed1-f66.google.com
[209.85.208.66])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA72A8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r15so5256968eds.9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:17:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=fPNhTz9w+gIerHLDgTOO92jd0bEQAoxIjT0+iLeuWZk=;
b=kBt1N9vJYJq2YHF5VIvOJ5PCaCAfsh57nTIcgUjrUopN94sdZKdyIDod2m2hT7iX/M
1GT6PromOS3juuS9sbOj+YhCNzb0YcMbP1RcJAQNFYS7GIXCS3AzfMhOUpQIL79Zc/9e
aUBzmzF5GVh2JOxfo8znPSUQEKmHbdcI3AHU8Rd3k8tcZwQoyp/UQ+qJmXbJe+lNyY6h
uWnwDeZbNsye1uZckpbEiYdY7ga1vfSMzg0r0bzRSWcKwvr9hWLuAY/4W26N5m5UdQjV
OsfgB3KGJmgsohjTLqpUBctSYg5y2pt8Jw/52NmapOu8JiOWyG9HGj4pnrlrZhwexhHp
w0oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuazkpW7WiPmGOmZ9N15ELaWSzJtVYPR9nZCE+0HM2XNXQcK/OHt
Xy6Ck/ZQddYN+l6OQ8IrpWfE5xBV1GxOZKmeQpM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZaCGWl9u/ePm5szu6My2YP89jpKvTlXG0n+NhI1btVIzlI7/entKQhxPOlJeVRVaFBp9PBNhJRIoDI8QjMO+U=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:35d9:: with SMTP id
p25mr8361357ejb.98.1549477044778;
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 10:17:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6D57649F-0236-4FBA-8376-4815F5F39E8A@gmail.com>
<CADZtCSgKu1LvjePNPT=0C0UYQvb47Ca0YN+B_AfgVNTpcOno4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CDAFC2F7-A0AD-460B-B5B1-A717F7EC700E@gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs_gvYy99Bch=7RwVszM_0PFTKUyqDVok=xfm4OOcqwaaQ@mail.gmail.com>
<6D36035C-A675-4845-9292-3BC16CD19B41@gmail.com>
<CAO3Pvs_Ai9d_uHC2a3ndGXhBoV-PDp2y_NShkbn=hRuzu=wNFw@mail.gmail.com>
<5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A850549-B6C9-4590-BA9B-0D69BBE531F9@gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 18:17:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgRY-EaPMORjipJuysi-z61VUMivOKmSeO1Rv7vXOPeLKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 20:16:52 +0000
Cc: Jim Posen <jimpo@coinbase.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Interrogating a BIP157 server,
BIP158 change proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 18:17:27 -0000
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:10 AM Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am skeptical that commitment of any filter will come into Core soon. [...] A committed filter makes light clients much more reliable and attractive, for some taste too much more.
You keep repeating this smear. Please stop.
If you would actually bother reading the threads where this was
discussed previously you will see that there was significant interest
from bitcoin developers to eventually commit an output filter, and a
significant investment of effort in improving the proposal to that
end. It is really disheartening to see you continue to repeat your
negative assumptions about other people's wishes when you haven't even
invested the time required to read their words.
|
