summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a1/5e94730e6f348644744e7f832eb2dcd448e772
blob: f1b51bd89513d2eeab35ee7319ba88521ecf741b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
Return-Path: <aymeric@peersm.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC49C002B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2023 12:24:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976440C46
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2023 12:24:24 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 4976440C46
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id HV_gjcXSt-g8
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2023 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 0C92F40A09
Received: from smtpout3.mo529.mail-out.ovh.net
 (smtpout3.mo529.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.54.81])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C92F40A09
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2023 12:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mxplan6.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.146.41])
 by mo529.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE3E215B1;
 Thu,  2 Feb 2023 12:24:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from peersm.com (37.59.142.107) by DAG6EX2.mxp6.local (172.16.2.52)
 with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.17; Thu, 2 Feb
 2023 13:24:20 +0100
Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass
 (GARM-107S0010851967f-c80c-4851-8a3a-42fa0f27b640,
 6AA1D679F834A14CBEAA49266E816969C7C1CEBF) smtp.auth=aymeric@peersm.com
X-OVh-ClientIp: 92.184.100.16
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
References: <CACrqygAMsO1giYuxm=DZUqfeRjEqGM7msmEnZ-AHws3oA2=aqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <764E460B-C0C6-47B8-A97E-F7CBC81FD645@petertodd.org> <Y9pxAdm3kO1rr2kU@camus>
 <Y9uc72RSs6LQojG4@petertodd.org>
 <16446c77-c9de-7b11-8e66-7f8e20421cba@peersm.com>
 <Y9ujTCAv+/du+zNU@petertodd.org>
From: Aymeric Vitte <aymeric@peersm.com>
Message-ID: <67fd09e8-f70b-c1be-78c3-f3ec936dfee8@peersm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 13:24:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Y9ujTCAv+/du+zNU@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.107]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG7EX1.mxp6.local (172.16.2.61) To DAG6EX2.mxp6.local
 (172.16.2.52)
X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: dda415aa-4edd-4a03-be5f-edaf82167439
X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 12354499678104806365
X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK
X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100
X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudefkedgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepuffvfhevhffkffgfgggjtgfgihesthekredttdefheenucfhrhhomhepteihmhgvrhhitgcugghithhtvgcuoegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuefgvdeuudeuvdeguddtteeihedttdejudeuffelfedutdejteduvedtheffgeeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomhdplhhinhhkvgguihhnrdgtohhmpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphepuddvjedrtddrtddruddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegrhihmvghrihgtsehpvggvrhhsmhdrtghomheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtoheprghpohgvlhhsthhrrgesfihpshhofhhtfigrrhgvrdhnvghtpdgsihhttghoihhnqdguvghvsehlihhsthhsrdhlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdhorhhgpdhpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhohedvledpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 13:02:30 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE
 OP_IF OP_PUSH
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 12:24:24 -0000

Thanks, then this limitation should be rethought I think (see the email
I just sent replying to the coloured thread)

Because it forces people to store in witness (less easy to track/show I
believe) or adopt some deviant behavior (like storing in addresses where
the utxo will remain unspendable forever)


Le 02/02/2023 à 12:49, Peter Todd a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 12:45:42PM +0100, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>> As far as I can read nobody replied to the initial question: what is
>> considered as good/best practice to store in Bitcoin?
> Your answer is beyond not putting unspendable data in the UTXO set, the exact
> details don't really matter. Do what makes sense for your specific application.
>
>> Reiterating my question: what are the current rules for OP_RETURN, max
>> size and number of OP_RETURN per tx
> Max 80 bytes, one OpReturn output per tx.
>
> This of course is the standardness rule. With a miner willing to mine non-std
> transactions anything goes.
>

-- 
Sophia-Antipolis, France
CV: https://www.peersm.com/CVAV.pdf
LinkedIn: https://fr.linkedin.com/in/aymeric-vitte-05855b26
GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms
A Universal Coin Swap system based on Bitcoin: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/029125db2583e1cf9c3209769eb2cdd7
A bitcoin NFT system: https://gist.github.com/Ayms/01dbfebf219965054b4a3beed1bfeba7
Move your coins by yourself (browser version): https://peersm.com/wallet
Bitcoin transactions made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transactions
torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live
node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor
Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.peersm.com
Peersm : http://www.peersm.com