1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
|
Return-Path: <dscotese@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9B6DFF8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com
[209.85.218.54])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2A912C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id w75so68799497oie.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=ZPe0r0PhHFJuMlNgUZ6YmZsFygumfJGodGcb1nXEDs4=;
b=qKJUBiCLQ0tEybR8tVH0K9buoje4LO0JuVeOpU6h9qlZuRRIOhEuuWRPI5QS+3ZYI5
V/8Mu9p1SyCQtDppvw4V0X043K09dL1iH+sUt/40Uoj3OChNVKYXtWfDPYJoAK0ZFvOu
fqQmqVBojyp/feNmYqFfTIMmqrX931rmUxXf76BDrmvz/ZNp1c7CY5IhWAjBWGhT1iiZ
P+WF+nm3d7mekweV7KzkmF0PgWXhk9QyxCsIT1ZCwqOoLhSPXEarjn4UQETtzPJyBPii
wTql6dByIujNo1Z1IqrgTxltbOqJZ+P4JTXxDN7ef124fpsDwNyfAQ51eYNy4kDbrMHb
bmXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=ZPe0r0PhHFJuMlNgUZ6YmZsFygumfJGodGcb1nXEDs4=;
b=JFFM60hmjBVFvuTBoOS7iPKiF0lkzi2gbcitJbQKEjpGGmnKVdC1s2M8m2Q8HvJD6w
g0pEc/i0CI4vohyt6cSWdbCzlX4B9GaeUlqFBxAjaEktbnFM+/jYECbjB/qRB7BRbNay
K3mrvVcYrkG0o6QP/NB01XV541CMXXnqJdSkYLZTHqucTRw0zJ9Bly0XaA70hbr6QtVW
/n2pJHL2TlIxUF41iywyYe2g9Cf8Gf6wRzrkrWHQeTMZh2pFri9CihOrCEvBnDPm5CaF
7bZsyOV7Lc6GHiplk8e7WfCrRvVngiEaMOrB3Ihk58LWs9oBAdftq6z7g1VsuJh6QnaA
A/EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSAeJ/DXhgg343/7b8ttwf5eWaNOiXVDCMOMGxx8dYvt+AJkHkUebnfABcXPZNp/o9mJ++UQ/55H8wFTg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.197.21 with SMTP id v21mr7144652oif.35.1453597583127;
Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Sender: dscotese@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.55.71 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
<87powvy20w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1736759.DT0dcscznj@1337h4x0r>
<20160123205953.GA22494@muck>
<3B18134A-3E3A-4A98-ADD3-9F5E8600047E@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 17:06:23 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZncqYi0L37WRRel4QfVVpArQvbg
Message-ID: <CAGLBAhfBwxnYyN=8EmpaZrfZSDWTL1StZOpqUO3scdzTu+Qxdw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com>
To: Gavin <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:08:23 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 01:06:25 -0000
--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+1
The distinction we are making importantly requires that contributors
provide readers with another thing to say in favor of something - another
thing which is different than "X people support this instead of only X-1
people." Evidence trumps votes.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should
> > contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation
> > the last +1 gave isn't useful.
>
> Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either technical
> discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the following
> should be encouraged:
>
> "+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that
> would have been prevented if XYZ.
>
> Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--
I like to provide some work at no charge to prove my value. Do you need a
techie?
I own Litmocracy <http://www.litmocracy.com> and Meme Racing
<http://www.memeracing.net> (in alpha).
I'm the webmaster for The Voluntaryist <http://www.voluntaryist.com> which
now accepts Bitcoin.
I also code for The Dollar Vigilante <http://dollarvigilante.com/>.
"He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satoshi
Nakamoto
--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>+1<br></div>The distinction we are making importantly=
requires that contributors provide readers with another thing to say in fa=
vor of something - another thing which is different than "X people sup=
port this instead of only X-1 people."=C2=A0 Evidence trumps votes.<br=
></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Ja=
n 23, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gavin via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">bitcoin=
-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
> On Jan 23, 2016, at 3:59 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D=
"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfound=
ation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I would extend this to say that the technical explanation also should<=
br>
> contribute uniquely to the conversation; a +1 with an explanation<br>
> the last +1 gave isn't useful.<br>
<br>
</span>Yes, comments should contribute to the discussion, with either techn=
ical discussion or additional relevant data. I think a +1 like the followin=
g should be encouraged:<br>
<br>
"+1: we had eleven customer support tickets in just the last week that=
would have been prevented if XYZ.<br>
<br>
Jane Doe, CTO CoinBitChainBasely.com"<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_sig=
nature"><div dir=3D"ltr">I like to provide some work at no charge to prove =
my value. Do you need a techie?=C2=A0 <br>I own <a href=3D"http://www.litmo=
cracy.com" target=3D"_blank">Litmocracy</a> and <a href=3D"http://www.memer=
acing.net" target=3D"_blank">Meme Racing</a> (in alpha). <br>I'm the we=
bmaster for <a href=3D"http://www.voluntaryist.com" target=3D"_blank">The V=
oluntaryist</a> which now accepts Bitcoin.<br>I also code for <a href=3D"ht=
tp://dollarvigilante.com/" target=3D"_blank">The Dollar Vigilante</a>.<br>&=
quot;He ought to find it more profitable to play by the rules" - Satos=
hi Nakamoto</div></div>
</div>
--001a1134e05c96b9ad052a0a0fa1--
|
