1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1R1iCL-0004lu-G1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:15:33 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1R1iCK-00022m-Pk for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:15:33 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-160-40.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
[184.4.160.40]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 075AD5605B5;
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:15:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:15:09 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.39-gentoo; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAK5y1FhQLWXtqHfB3HymOkZ-5LdTqdEkX8bM=nOGhFeZrOPwgA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJNQ0suvvAC+TBu5Cbt+Q2=aycMnVHRXXGccEdytSZOj10w5JA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2sbLc-ATpf7Uu1S6UQfhd2LPPoHRJmvjZuzH2CUS-TqQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2sbLc-ATpf7Uu1S6UQfhd2LPPoHRJmvjZuzH2CUS-TqQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201109081315.12643.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Headers-End: 1R1iCK-00022m-Pk
Cc: David Perry <enmaku@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alert System
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:15:33 -0000
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:51:02 PM Mike Hearn wrote:
> Bitcoin is one of the few pieces of software I use that has no concept of
> automatic updates or even notifications at all. Yet the network badly
> relies on people upgrading for stability, scalability and to enable new
> features.
>
> If the alert system goes away, it'd just end up being replaced by polling
> something over HTTP, which is less decentralized than before. Having zero
> way to communicate upgrades to end-users is a non-starter for anything
> serious about mass market penetration.
In fact, I think the alert system should relay (note, NOT display) messages
*regardless of the key used*, so it isn't yet another "our client gets special
status" thing, and can be used for other clients as well.
|
