1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
Return-Path: <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64939E8A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 07:56:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f52.google.com (mail-qg0-f52.google.com
[209.85.192.52])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4992BA0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 07:56:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k90so85425931qge.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 23:56:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=VArz4TIRKWQMAVmKhTkLiBaQmqmL0+e97PxsteD6WvQ=;
b=uWL1SxpPqZBUmhC+D6VXFbY0yI8nyLNV38R/MFeCsDrfpXQi4q4MaqyQ0WdiTE5zZZ
GuVD35kTF2qUTHIiPe4PEwP2uEQ4Ila5OP8/INkS4T9RehG7zSNhZo0ibvAzInwRdYXB
lsOnv7Syl6WUEPDIL8TcFZN1XI91yvdJYd4rXanNdrp5iCb4OemLUJK8exVXS+mtEyIt
7NhLUABbFsWfgUh4yqqHYZe9v5fNjCj+iOlQKI+eiLDxstMR0QPfeDg2SAAVpl8AKav0
BVYgRBjOIrIVJdvTHKXB0KaxJfZCyVd0u+OCsgLamLz8ZYabfWIzn3SFayM1me4xcRg4
72/w==
X-Received: by 10.140.177.3 with SMTP id x3mr17876371qhx.82.1450598183379;
Sat, 19 Dec 2015 23:56:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.29.73 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Dec 2015 23:56:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAcC9ysejDQ8tyn_hhTQ_1ToKsM2f2rdhG4d1X3O5uuBj1X8NQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151219184240.GB12893@muck>
<CAAcC9yvh2ma2dFhNDEKs7vfXyQF9L+T0YtRvOsJ15AbfVti=cw@mail.gmail.com>
<219f125cee6ca68fd27016642e38fdf1@xbt.hk>
<CAAcC9ys_t7X0WpQ8W3577M8GLiA5sPV2F1BJ9qZbnMkE-1j3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<aff8da46a69bdd7ef92ca87725866a5c@xbt.hk>
<CAPkFh0vNECi1OmBwki+8NNAQbe6EG2FEE4RR5z=kYVLLDFHUXg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAcC9ysejDQ8tyn_hhTQ_1ToKsM2f2rdhG4d1X3O5uuBj1X8NQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Emin_G=C3=BCn_Sirer?= <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 02:56:03 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPkFh0u+pHWQfJJX5pJR5N5rhs=K0CgDaZwkf+dOS1UHMUU+bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Priest <cp368202@ohiou.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a6a8e6eab3e05274fb591
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:15:23 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 07:56:25 -0000
--001a113a6a8e6eab3e05274fb591
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Initial reactions aren't always accurate, people's views change, and
science has its insurmountable way of convincing people. Gavin [1]
and others [2] now cite selfish mining as a concern in the block size
debate, and more importantly, the paper has been peer-reviewed,
cited, and even built-upon [3].
Let's elevate the discussion, shall we?
[1] Here's Gavin concerned about selfish mining:
http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners
[2] Here's Adam:
http://bitcoin-development.narkive.com/mvI8Wpjp/dynamic-limit-to-the-block-size-bip-draft-discussion
[3] This is a very nice extension of our work:
Ayelet Sapirshtein, Yonatan Sompolinsky, Aviv Zohar:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06183
--001a113a6a8e6eab3e05274fb591
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Initial reactions aren't always accurate, people&=
#39;s views change, and=C2=A0</div><div>science has its insurmountable way =
of convincing people. Gavin [1]=C2=A0</div><div>and others [2] now cite sel=
fish mining as a concern in the block size=C2=A0</div><div>debate, and more=
importantly, the paper has been peer-reviewed,=C2=A0</div><div>cited, and =
even built-upon [3].</div><div><br></div><div>Let's elevate the discuss=
ion, shall we?</div><div><br></div><div>[1] Here's Gavin concerned abou=
t selfish mining:=C2=A0</div><div><a href=3D"http://gavinandresen.ninja/are=
-bigger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners">http://gavinandresen.ninja/are-big=
ger-blocks-better-for-bigger-miners</a></div><div><br></div><div>[2] Here&#=
39;s Adam:=C2=A0</div><div><a href=3D"http://bitcoin-development.narkive.co=
m/mvI8Wpjp/dynamic-limit-to-the-block-size-bip-draft-discussion">http://bit=
coin-development.narkive.com/mvI8Wpjp/dynamic-limit-to-the-block-size-bip-d=
raft-discussion</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>[3] This is a very nice ex=
tension of our work:</div><div>Ayelet Sapirshtein, Yonatan Sompolinsky, Avi=
v Zohar:</div><div><a href=3D"http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.06183">http://arxiv=
.org/abs/1507.06183</a><br></div><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<br></div></div>
--001a113a6a8e6eab3e05274fb591--
|
